How to sort objects in Javascript using array,sort #shorts

My VSCode Extensions:
- theme: material community high contrast
- fonts: Menlo, Monaco, 'Courier New', monospace
- errors: Error Lens
- extra git help: Git Lens
- tailwind css intellisense
- indent rainbow
- material icon theme
- prettier & eslint
- ES7+ React Snippets

[hugodsa]

You are easily the best YouTuber using shorts in my feed. Love it. ❤

[hamzadarej]

Names.sort((a, b)=>b.isPaid - a.isPaid);
Shorter Code 😉

[Pacvalham]

With type coercion, you can return the subtraction of their isPaid properties.

[arditzubaku]

What extension are you using to show errors like that ?

[IdleAtre]

i would do: names.sort((a, b) => b.isPaid - a.isPaid)

[sagirorlich]

What screen recording app are you using? Great videos

[sayamqazi]

if we are using is "is" prefix for Booleans, that name attribute could use a "str" prefix. Actually I wish there was a way to declare types in javascript... Oh wait!

[yadusolparterre]

Good practice: always use a [...spread operator] when sorting an array so you don't accidentally mutate your original array

[sahadpop]

is it bcoz of any kind of extension he uses which helps him to show errors as you type ?

[davidriveramorales]

Is this similar to comparator in Java?

[kristiyanbalevski]

I'd love a video about functioning programming approaches / advanced functions

[explodatedfaces]

I'd love your opinion on this, do you think it's important to stick with if statements when writing something like this?

For example, you can accomplish the same thing using this:

arr.sort((a) => (a.isPaid == true) ? -1 : 1);

Because the property is binary, it must either be true or not true I simplified it to make it the most readable it can be.. but I have to wonder do you think it's a better practice to avoid ternary operators for readability? Obviously, for more complex logic this readability doesn't scale, but it's nice to get opinions from people who have worked with JS longer.