The Atheist’s WORST Nightmare 😰 (This EXPOSES Them)

This is the Atheist's WORST Nightmare
They cannot provide evidence to support THEIR position!
#shorts #atheism #apologetics
—————————————————————————————
If you feel led to donate, there are options below:

SUBSCRIBE to my other channel, Lion of Fire RAW

Subscribe to my Shorts channel (all videos under 60 seconds):

*Also subscribe on*
RUMBLE
ODYSEE
FACEBOOK
(see links in the ABOUT section of my channel page).

✅ Recommended Playlists

The BEST of Lion of Fire Ministries

VICTORY in Christ:

Topical Teachings:

Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, news, reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.

All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel does not claim any right over them.

[lionoffireministries]

To any atheist who still claims that they are neutral, and not implicitly making a claim, see my answer below ⬇️

You are making an implicit claim whether you like it or not.

I lack belief in your claim that you’re neutral and not implicitly making a claim. I will withhold belief until you provide me with sufficient evidence to support your claim that you are neutral and not implicitly making a claim. You have not provided me with sufficient evidence for this.

[MonsieurFeshe]

The burden of proof is not on us my guy.

[JenniH-mjvh]

Not trying to judge, but they can get really mean, now I'm sinning by gossip but you can give them actual proof and they still want to be the one to say nope you're wrong, I'm right. It's trying when you get stuck speaking with an atheist. Pointless waste of time, fruitless arguments. Sigh. Forgive me Lord, give me strength.

[Phase]

why do "believers" insist that everyone else "believe" as well? there are no "gods".

[rjserrano]

Your entire argument is flawed and you are the one trying to shirk the burden of proof. And no, that the universe can exist without a god is not a claim that carries with it a burden of proof.
You assert that at least one god exists. I've seen no evidence of that. The burden is entirely on you.
Your apologetics are badly wanting.

[maggiegoossens]

I have long ago stopped using the word atheist. In my mind that is something that does NOT exist.
The one/thing that you give authority over to rule, organize and control your life is your god. He/it is on the throne of your life, you worship it, adore it and try to please it as much as you can.
A person who claims to not adhere to any one or any thing is a LIAR. He has put HIMSELF on the throne of authority.
Therefore I call him an EGOTHEIST. I am my own god, I listen to or take orders from no one else. I decide!
So to me they’re all egotheists.

[michaelmason]

Hi Matt. science can’t prove there is no God. Neither can a atheist. Life can’t come from non life.
Keep these coming young man, you’re a true inspiration.

[kakite]

No we say this because proving a negative is impossible. If you say you don't believe in unicorns does this automatically mean that they might exist?

[lhvinny]

"The science contradicts this very position" Liar! No scientific study anywhere has indicated that a god is necessary for any aspect of reality.

[MrSaemichlaus]

Wow dude you've turned the whole thing inside out, congratulations.

[louisem]

Why is there a label put on people who don’t believe in something there’s absolutely no proof of. There isn’t a name for people who don’t believe in fairies. Stop this silly nonsense about belief in gods. Jews, m u s l i m s, Christians, Mormons, Hindus, Sikhs, which is the real one? Depends on geography I suppose. It’s mad, childish and should stop.

[MathewSteeleAtheology]

There's no rational justification for the claim that anything can exist immaterially, wholly apart from all matter and energy.

There's no rational justification for the claim that anything can begin to exist from nothingness.

There's no rational justification for the claim that all matter an energy are finite.

There's no rational justification that a mind and/or consciousness can exist without a body.

All of that adds up to theism being pure speculation. @lionoffireministries You assume that someone has to argue that either A) "God" or B) no "God" is the case, but the only rationally justified position is that the cosmos exists, and we are part of it. Coming up with ANY explanation about where everything came from is to make stuff up. You may be happy with that, I don't know. But it's certainly not rational.

So much for my "worst nightmare."

[flemmingbroni]

You can’t demand a proof from someone lacking belief in something. If you’re lacking belief, then you are. And that in it self does not demand a proof.

[Johnsmith-hptw]

Our worst nightmare is the banana, because it disproves our evil religion of evolution

[SpaceGo]

Let me hold your hand when I say this : A lack of belief is like if you filled up a jar of gum balls yourself in front of me and then you tell me “ I bet there’s an even number of gum balls in there’ and I say ‘okay prove it” I don’t have to give you any proof to why there isn’t I didn’t make a claim you did.

[strangelyjamesly]

I claim now that there is no God. No Gods. No luck. No Karma. No afterlife. Only this life. Live it the best way you can before you die.

[donovannaghitorabi]

If someone makes a claim, and someone else is unconvinced, you’re saying the unconvinced person makes an implicit claim that it is possible the first person is wrong, which requires evidence.

Can this be extrapolated out a bit? Are you saying that I can make anything up, and if you’re unconvinced, you’ve gotten stuck in an untenable position because you’re implicitly claiming it’s possible I’m wrong, without evidence?

[Therealgrillglove]

Do you believe that there are elephants on the dark side of the moon? If you do, provide us the evidence. If you do not, how do you know? are you omnipresent.

Also I would like to know your response to someone who would say that they dont know enough to make a good decision on what god to believe in (or at all).

[rumourhats]

Well, it's fine in a philosophical sense to debate a philosophic idea of "god" whether its by the argument of design, ontologically, cosmologically, etc...

but it's another leap of the theist, that assumes this "God/prime mover/perfect greatest idea" is the God of Christianity, Islam, or any other "human" religion.

[froggygreen]

Please pray for my friend Tanya who says she doesn't want to follow Jesus because He doesn't save everybody