Great! Imma vote right now! Love this channel, thank you so much.
biko
More over with dimensions tell us or show us how to make any plane, like how to shape it as there's rule of anything to be built so as aerodynamics, choosing chord length to wing span, fuselage length to fuselage height, horizontal stabilizer to vertical stabilizer, elevator to rudder etc etc
jalalhaider
Vans rv-8 with Fernando Abasolo colors
Benjaminabasolo
Hi good to see you back, I was waiting to see you show up 😇
I would say that an RC glider with styrofoam would be excellent not just because I like it it is for RC noobs who watches your videos or get an inspiration in this hobby it's good for them to start with, more over balsa wood is expensive thing or at times hard to find in different countries or places, styrofoam is cheap, and is available and it's good to start with, I hope you show us how you make glider, how you so with dimensions how you make wing dihedral etc etc and I guess that's what I suppose to say 😇
jalalhaider
Btw Love ur videos, its really nice to see how ur channel evolved to a more professional look! Great job.
Kinda sad here, I made 5 attempts to make an rc plane and ALL of them failed. LMAO
You are very good at making RC planes. Keep it up :)
rohankatreddy
put the video of making a real flying Boeing 737 ng model
rishikrishnaganesh
information. it is safe to assume that these Weird, amateur designs are Not without Flaws. very few people (or manufacturers) REALLY know how to design a good model aircraft. for example, the profile used in each set of plans is NOT what it Should be. it should be either a clark-y (or n-10). a bi-plane is an ANTIQUATED design; and is poorly suited, to being made so small. since none of you boys knows anything about towline gliders, i don't see those plans working out, EITHER. therefore, i suggest that that you pretend to use the plans, while ACTUALLY making a 3-channel SLOW-FLYER. a slow-flyer wing should have a sufficient amount of dihedral in its wing*, and a Single-surface profile should be used.!!! googletranslate at link, see a slow-flyer. *so that ailerons are not Needed.
n-10 profile
daviddavids
it is not clear WHY you have asked such stoopid questions.!!!!
i would welcome one Intelligent question. but, one is NOT present.!!!!
is a bi-plane an Antiquated design? why YES, yes it is!!!!
is it weird to make a rather Small bi-plane? why YES, yes it
do you boys know anything about rc gliders? why NO, no you don't.!!!!
consequently, NEITHER set of plans is a 'good' choice, for your intended audience.!!!
it can be Seen that, these designs (by 'hobbyists' contain abnormalities'/flaws.!!!
so, if you Already knew that fact, you would Not have asked me, about flaws.!
your (broadly stated) opinion about profiles is less-than precisely accurate.!!!
this is so, because, there are just a few profile TYPES.!
and, the Fundamental design of ANY profile used Should Be optimized, for flying in a very low-reynolds number environment.!!!! (low-re#)
you are invited to view my tutorials. you are invited to stare, blankly, at the linked MAE lecture notes; see 'lecture1' thru 'lecture24'. ('lecture6' deals with the Optimal locations of cg and center of mass (c-m)) googletranslate
