How To Get A Perfect 36 On ACT English - 2 Must-Know Strategies From A Perfect Scorer

The ACT English section is the EASIEST section to score a perfect 36 and drastically improve your score 5, 8, even 10 points! 94% of my students score 30 and above on the ACT English Test, and in this video I will share my expert advice, tips, strategies, and secrets so that you can too!

To crush the ACT English Test in 2024, there are 2 keys: (1) learn ALL the grammar rules tested on the ACT and (2) learn the best strategies and pattern-spotting techniques to make ACT English feel easy on test day. I truly believe that almost anyone can score 30 and above on the ACT English Test. I have coached over 150 students to scores of 34-36 on ACT English, so I know exactly what it takes to achieve top scores.

Don't forget to like and subscribe! New ACT videos each week.

[getcrazed]

this got me from 25 to 35 on this section

[walter-ytmu]

Me who got the ultimate act guide. It really help got my English score from a 21 to a 26 and its still climbing.

[cwbrd]

Used only the free course, and on the last ACT I was able to improve my english from 21 to a 25. I plan on getting the paid package for the act in september to improve my scores even more. Thanks!

[LifeWithShawn]

I got a 11 on the English ACT the first time on Mar 27 of this year since I’m a junior but hope to score better this October when I’m a senior

[Learnjapanesefromsomeguy]

Great videos. But at 1:45, how can you say that is not specific to one person? It is true that there may be multiple organizers, but the way the sentence is written, one could reasonably assume that she is the only one. Perhaps I am not quite understanding what "specific" means in this case.

By definition, one can only have one best friend. Perhaps it is because the title, "festival organizer, " itself does not convey a feeling of uniqueness?

What if, though, the writer of this article knew that Dottie Thompson was the only festival organizer? Would that have any effect on how the sentence should be written?

And what about a sentence that describes a CEO? Generally, that title belongs to one person.

Tomorrow, the CEO, Bill Smith, will be at the meeting.
Tomorrow, the CEO Bill Smith will be at the meeting.

I just looked it up, though, and it is possible for a single company to have multiple CEOs. In that case, which of the above sentences would be correct?

[raginginlowercase]

So if you added "the" it would make it specific enough to be the festival organizer "Dottie Thompson"

[ChansooHwang-jj]

Can you post those section overviews on each section? Those really helped!

[luisserranolaguna]

how do you distinguish if something is common or not common tho for the name rule

[fjccommish]

1:33 What if the friend was already identified?

I have a friend who lives next door. We have been friends for years. My friend, John Smith, is coming to my house for dinner on Saturday.

[ddelprogaming]

started at a 40/75, currently average about 66-69/75 of questions. I tend to get a lot of questions wrong in the last or last 2 passages. Are the passages in difficulty order?

[nayeemahmadxt]

Is the 10 McGraw act practice tests worth to take even though it’s from 6-7 years ago, and if not do you know any good act practice tests sites

[ItsJustMyOpinion]

Hello! I love watching your videos since I am preparing for the ACT in September. Now a question occured in my most recent english test, and I can't find my mistake. Maybe someone could help?

Yet until 1903, few visitors could gain access to the trees in the *park: there was* was no completed road.

A: No change
B: park: because there was
D: park; because there was
E: park;

I thought we have two independet clauses "Few visitors could gain access to the trees in the park" and "there was no completed road" and I could therefor go with E. But in the anwsers it says there is a phrase and I should go with A? Can someone please explain? Thank you so much!

[MarleyMaged-jb]

Taking my second ACT test on 14 th of december, I wanted to ask you if I can improve my score or get a 36 in such a short time. My first score is 22, in this case is it possible?
I don't know exactly where are my weaknesses. Struggling really bad in the reading and science sections , I got 17 and 21 respectively.Is there any hope?

[fewkeyfewkey]

Nah I can't take this serious u look and sound similar to Andrew Tate 💀