filmov
tv
Penny Nance: Nutty attacks on pro-lifers by Sen. Gillibrand and CEOs may help make abortion a winnin
Показать описание
There is a new level of hostility by the ruling class toward people in this nation, even women and minorities, who dare to believe in the intrinsic value of human life and thus identify as pro-life.
The left is losing the 46-year argument on the federalization of abortion laws, and it has made them angry and reckless.
They are now publicly equating our support for life to racism. It’s insidious and bigoted, but it’s also self-destructive.
KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND COMPARES PRO-LIFE BELIEFS TO RACISM, ‘NOT ACCEPTABLE’
On the political front, during an interview with the Des Moines Register “Gillibrand Compares Pro-Life Viewpoint to Racism, ‘Not Acceptable’, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., was clear in her racist allegations against pro-lifers on Tuesday.
Gillibrand said, "I think there's some issues that have such moral clarity that we have as a society decided that the other side is not acceptable. Imagine saying that it's okay to appoint a judge who's racist or anti-Semitic or homophobic. Asking someone to appoint someone who takes away basic human rights of any group of people in America—I don't think that those are political issues anymore.”
She made these offensive remarks responding to a question about having a litmus test for judicial nominees.
Gillibrand is polling near the bottom among the early Democratic candidates, and it’s clear why this is so. She’s lost sight of the fact that there has been a dramatic shift toward life this year in response to the radicalized abortion laws in 31 states like her very own, New York, and efforts by Virginia’s governor and others.
Americans are now as likely to identify as pro-life (47 percent) as pro-choice (47 percent). And this shift has been clearly moving toward life. A previous survey conducted by The Marist Poll found Americans more likely to identify as pro-choice than as pro-life (55 to 38 percent). Americans are choosing life.
Gillibrand wrapped up her response by continuing to attack those of us she says society finds unacceptable, who love a God who values the life He created.
She said, "And we believe in this country in the separation of church and state, and I respect the rights of every American to hold their religious beliefs true to themselves, but our country and our Constitution has always demanded that we have a separation of church and state. And all these efforts by President Trump and other ultra-radical conservative judges and justices to impose their faith on Americans is contrary to our Constitution and that's what this is. And so, I believe that for all of these issues, they are not issues that there is a fair other side. There is no moral equivalency when you come to racism, and I do not believe there is a moral equivalency when it comes to changing laws that deny women reproductive freedom."
Gillibrand has been wielding some self-righteous wordsmithing calling abortion a human right, a reproductive right, and a civil right. The proble
The left is losing the 46-year argument on the federalization of abortion laws, and it has made them angry and reckless.
They are now publicly equating our support for life to racism. It’s insidious and bigoted, but it’s also self-destructive.
KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND COMPARES PRO-LIFE BELIEFS TO RACISM, ‘NOT ACCEPTABLE’
On the political front, during an interview with the Des Moines Register “Gillibrand Compares Pro-Life Viewpoint to Racism, ‘Not Acceptable’, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., was clear in her racist allegations against pro-lifers on Tuesday.
Gillibrand said, "I think there's some issues that have such moral clarity that we have as a society decided that the other side is not acceptable. Imagine saying that it's okay to appoint a judge who's racist or anti-Semitic or homophobic. Asking someone to appoint someone who takes away basic human rights of any group of people in America—I don't think that those are political issues anymore.”
She made these offensive remarks responding to a question about having a litmus test for judicial nominees.
Gillibrand is polling near the bottom among the early Democratic candidates, and it’s clear why this is so. She’s lost sight of the fact that there has been a dramatic shift toward life this year in response to the radicalized abortion laws in 31 states like her very own, New York, and efforts by Virginia’s governor and others.
Americans are now as likely to identify as pro-life (47 percent) as pro-choice (47 percent). And this shift has been clearly moving toward life. A previous survey conducted by The Marist Poll found Americans more likely to identify as pro-choice than as pro-life (55 to 38 percent). Americans are choosing life.
Gillibrand wrapped up her response by continuing to attack those of us she says society finds unacceptable, who love a God who values the life He created.
She said, "And we believe in this country in the separation of church and state, and I respect the rights of every American to hold their religious beliefs true to themselves, but our country and our Constitution has always demanded that we have a separation of church and state. And all these efforts by President Trump and other ultra-radical conservative judges and justices to impose their faith on Americans is contrary to our Constitution and that's what this is. And so, I believe that for all of these issues, they are not issues that there is a fair other side. There is no moral equivalency when you come to racism, and I do not believe there is a moral equivalency when it comes to changing laws that deny women reproductive freedom."
Gillibrand has been wielding some self-righteous wordsmithing calling abortion a human right, a reproductive right, and a civil right. The proble