Bandicam vs Fraps comparison

preview_player
Показать описание
Detailed comparison between Bandicam vs Fraps.
Conclusion: Fraps turns out to be smoother. The picture quality is equal. Fraps wins.

Game: TrackMania 2: Canyon
Computer specs:
i7 930
6GB @ 1600mhz
GTX 470
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

but bandicam has more lag i have 16 gb ram and amd quad core cpu and it still lags

eMMxMoDDzZ
Автор

Bandicam size is only larger than fraps while comparing "Lossless RGB" in both programs.

Lossless is a codec which doesn't lose any quality while recording and when comparing this feature Fraps is more efficient than Bandicam.

However, if you continue to watch the video you will see that "normal" codecs aka lossy, which most people uses will indeed be smaller than Fraps. You judge the quality though. It's all in the video. =)

Kraegan
Автор

It matters because it doesnt lag or use up useful hardrive space

jas
Автор

The playback, if the recording is slow then consider buying a better PC or lower game settings

ZHEER
Автор

Let me get this straight. Bandicam and fraps are both good recorders, however they differ from computer. Some computers can record with bandicam better. I personally cannot (it lags like hell and pic quality is rubbish) but fraps is great for ME. So it is up to your comp and different factors as well so you need to test out the trial versions for both just so you know what it is like for you. That is what a trial is for!

BloonsEngines
Автор

this is all about the file size?? why does it even matter to you guys? you're not going to be uploading right after recording, use sony vegas or somthing to convert to mp4, i want to know which one has less fps drops

ZHEER
Автор

I use Fraps for some games, and Bandicam for others

KuboGaming
Автор

you mixed up the files dude.
I get a little less then 20 fps while recording with fraps but I get a bit more then 50 fps with bandicam. the files of fraps are larger and with the free version you can record 30 seconds with fraps and 10 minutes with bandicam.
overall: fraps - 0 points
bandicam- 3 points
a difference of 100%
so the only reason you have your results are; you mixed up the files.

shumy
Автор

Bandicam Is Good At Quality But So Lag Fraps Is good 

GeorgeKarala
Автор

actually the uncompressed file is less laggy as long as you have a fast hard disk.

ZHEER
Автор

fraps is neither better or worse than all of those recorders. They differ from comp to comp. But one fact - EZVid is just about profit (although it is free) and they advertise like hell, but rendering the video takes SO LONG. 1 minute and about 5 mins rendering.

BloonsEngines
Автор

fraps is better than bandicam hypercam ezvidz

cyrusgutierrez
Автор

so you're saying that the playback will be less laggy, or the recording

justanothererd
Автор

Bandicam is known for having small file size and no frame drop
This video doesnt make sense!

shieri