Should We Be Ashamed of Winston Churchill? | Good Morning Britain

preview_player
Показать описание
Afua Hirsch and Gisela Stuart debate on whether or not we should celebrate Winston Churchill as a hero or instead be ashamed of him for his racist views.

Broadcast on 15/05/2018

Like, follow and subscribe to Good Morning Britain!

The Good Morning Britain YouTube channel delivers you the news that you’re waking up to in the morning. From exclusive interviews with some of the biggest names in politics and showbiz to heartwarming human interest stories and unmissable watch again moments.

Join Susanna Reid, Piers Morgan, Ben Shephard, Kate Garraway, Charlotte Hawkins and Sean Fletcher every weekday on ITV from 6am.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF SAVING SOMEONE WHEN YOU'RE KILLING SOMEONE ON THE OTHER HAND!!!!

ramaniabraham
Автор

No need to feel shame for anyone, just know the historical truth of the situation, Pearce is being idiotic and not listening to what the lady was saying! Crazy stuff

manveersingh
Автор

Mate, how can people take Piers Morgan seriously? He sounds like a child “No it’s not true, him good, you bad”

ernestomonge
Автор

Piers should invite shashi tharoor...he is the one to give piers all the answers he want.

shivanigautam
Автор

I don't care what left and right argues about but the fact is that the Soviet Union defeated the Nazis. Not you, guys. Learn history.

nikolatesla
Автор

He killed 3 million in 3 months Bengal famine😢😢😢. Suppose if Hilter planned to kill 50 million people then Churchill would prevent that from happening by killing 80 million people just for his hatred/pride towards Indians and African nations, that’s the kind of person he is…

Imthesaviour
Автор

Million s hungerdeaths...
how can Pierce watch indian people in the eyes...holy...

sebbosebbo
Автор

The dude starved people in another country is that not genocide.

RK-lnkg
Автор

Let's see it this way. Basically Churchill needed ammo made of bones. He couldn't use the European bones as he felt they were superior. So why not use bones of people far away and about whom his audience would not even bat an eyelid. That way he becomes a hero even though the bones used as ammo were those of innocent people whose lands his people invaded and enslaved. Clear and simple logical analogy based on facts. Nothing more. Nothing less

ashokseshadri
Автор

As Hitler was greatest villain for Europe and western countries, Wiston Churchill is and always be the greatest villain for colonial Asia and Africa. And Piers is racist too he is willing to talk about Jews life and Western lives and not Indian, African, Welsh and Irish lives. Also the world war was won because of America and Russian involvement and millions of soldiers from colonial countries not by British alone. So the Piers keep your ego and attitude on side and read a bit of history before you host any show. Just arguing that Winston Churchill was the person that won the war won't change the fact.

astraveer
Автор

Probably piers have a blood relation with this man who looks like all the money had invested on his face and neck.😂

VibrantVedicLife
Автор

Churchill deserve the world number one villain title!! He is a criminal and a worse creature!!!

just-for-fun-
Автор

what Churchill did to Indians(go through the 1943 Bengal famine: An artificial catastrophe ) is no less than what Hitler did to Jews. And yet here ae some people addressing him as a war hero. This clearly shows the superiority complex and racist mindset they hold and the irony is here is he sitting and criticizing Hitler for his deeds. Have some shame atleast.

ritesh_saw
Автор

An intelligent woman debating a 4year old kid

Eseros
Автор

Man, Piers Morgan sounds so insincere and bad faith here. He is just creating this straw man and attacking relentlessly, instead of actually engaging with what Afua Hirsch says.

Hirsch agrees that what Churchill did in WWII is admirable, remarkable, truly special. She also - rightfully - argues that Churchill personally carries a huge responsibility for the deaths of millions of Indians.

Churchill was an absolute hero in World War II. He also was an absolute racist who contributed to the deaths and suffering of millions in British colonies. I believe we as human beings are intelligent and capable enough to welcome both ideas at the same time and to see Churchill as he really was, in all his complexity.

terraincognita
Автор

It would make a interesting comparing to see, how lives he saved by going into war and also how many deaths he caused because of his actions in British colonies. Even after that people would say, as long as they are not our families, it is fine.

chibbuss
Автор

You don't praise a murderer for his bravery in killing someone or for his love for his country. It's not moral.
And what was the British army made of ?

a_peace_loving_man
Автор

Saying Churchill brought the Americans into the war is hyperbole. The Japanese bombing pear harbor and Germany declaring war was the real reason.

MalikF
Автор

Churchill is a hero because of saving English from Germany...and saving At the same time he was proud of ruling India and Africa and killing their Pls accept truth and real history... I mean this is hypocrisy defined...

amitsonawane
Автор

Winston Churchill was responsible for the Great Bengal famine that killed more than 3 million only in Bengal. That is just 1 state. That's a man who should have been tried for war crimes.

elle