filmov
tv
@maedones9510 diba totoo nmn.. 🤣😘✌️
Показать описание
@TheViewpoint21 @meannemapa931 @teacherMarkreacts
Presidential bet Vice President Leni Robredo slams rival Ferdinand ‘Bongbong’ Marcos Jr. once again over his continuous disinformation attacks against her. “Ang sinungaling sa umpisa sinungaling din sa kahuli-hulihan. Kawawa ‘yong mga Pilipinong napapaniwala,” she says. #PHVote #WeDecide
That's TRUE.. Diba totoo naman nangyari nga at WALANG NAPATUNATAN na DINAYA daw si NGIWI noon na nilampaso sya ni Mamenk sa VP position noon, at hanggang sa SC ang iyak nyan ni BBM na DINAYA daw sya. 🤭
PROVE ME WRONG YAWANG KUHOL A.K.A. @infinitestreamstv I DARE!!
For me I could say DuDirty has a doze of his own medicine 💊 🤣💯%
👉"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus"👈 is a Latin maxim meaning "false in one thing, false in everything". It's a #legal_principle suggesting that a witness who is proven to have lied about one fact in their testimony is not credible on any part of their testimony. While often invoked, it's not a strict rule of law in all jurisdictions and is often viewed as a rule of caution, allowing courts to consider the credibility of the entire testimony in light of the falsehood.
Presidential bet Vice President Leni Robredo slams rival Ferdinand ‘Bongbong’ Marcos Jr. once again over his continuous disinformation attacks against her. “Ang sinungaling sa umpisa sinungaling din sa kahuli-hulihan. Kawawa ‘yong mga Pilipinong napapaniwala,” she says. #PHVote #WeDecide
That's TRUE.. Diba totoo naman nangyari nga at WALANG NAPATUNATAN na DINAYA daw si NGIWI noon na nilampaso sya ni Mamenk sa VP position noon, at hanggang sa SC ang iyak nyan ni BBM na DINAYA daw sya. 🤭
PROVE ME WRONG YAWANG KUHOL A.K.A. @infinitestreamstv I DARE!!
For me I could say DuDirty has a doze of his own medicine 💊 🤣💯%
👉"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus"👈 is a Latin maxim meaning "false in one thing, false in everything". It's a #legal_principle suggesting that a witness who is proven to have lied about one fact in their testimony is not credible on any part of their testimony. While often invoked, it's not a strict rule of law in all jurisdictions and is often viewed as a rule of caution, allowing courts to consider the credibility of the entire testimony in light of the falsehood.