What is Actual Speed of Gravity? (Ft. KhAnubis)

Some of the artwork in this video was derived and modified from Veectzy.

How fast is gravity? Is it the instantaneous force we all make it out to be or is it limited in speed ? In this video we take a look at how gravity is not the instantaneous force Issac Newton made it out to be but rather has a cap on it’s speed limit. In this video we will be taking a look at the dynamic motions of space time as well as the speed at which they occur.

Sources:

[yurikz]

i love to see smaller channels coming together 💕💕

[Alanpie]

Here's a totally naive question. Why do physicists say that gravity "warps" space rather than that gravity "defines" space? In your example of the disappearing eight ball, if that's what it was, you say that, after the disappearance, space returns to its "normal" shape. What was its "normal" shape? The analogy to a pond assumes that a "normal" pond has no ripples, but this sounds more like an ideal pond than a real one.

[TheExamAnalyst]

Hii i am indian and I made time travel posbel but English is very Beck I made formula

[mohdrazif]

Hi, I'm your 3107th subscriber. Looking forward to watch more high quality content from this channel.

[tuberroot]

Just stating something as an assertion with no evidence is not science. Waste of time.

[quahntasy]

Nice, sometime in future consider including me too!

[dollabz]

Ok but we orbit the instantaneous position of the sun, not it's time delayed position.

Why?

[williamwalker]

The speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion.

Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton.

Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles.




Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997

[ALZlper]

I am giving you my sub on probation. Keep up the good work. 👍🏻

[christophergame]

It would be unphysical for the sun just to cease to exist. But it would perhaps be physical for it to explode. Supposing the explosion to have a symmetry, what would the gravitic effects be on the earth's motion?

[ericpham]

to know exact speed of gravity is not yet measured but it is faster than light for sure the point is how much faster?

[kevindorsett]

Gravity has no speed, it is not moving, but it’s effects make matter travel at measurable speeds. Big difference. Gravity can move but does not move itself. Gravity is constant and removes the chaos of lost matter becoming stagnant. Without gravity no matter would coalesce to form planets and stars. Gravity assigns matter a map of building blocks to form.

[vladnurk]

suggest to measure gravity speed detect with LIGO detect a gravity wave arrival against the visual observation photons as a result of the collision say of 2 white dwarfs or 2 neutron stars

[aartman]

The absence of a Sun would have no meaningful effect over & above temperature drop...
The Earth has its own gravity...

[Lord_Volkner]

I completely missed the actual evidence that gravity travels and the speed of light. He just claims it, but never actually demonstrates how or why.

[deonmcadams]

And also just dawned on me because our senses are divided we aren't able to perceive the higher dimension if we were able to add all of those together at not individually what's ominously I think we may be on to 2 something

[technics]

What about speed of gravity in different materials? Light is slower in non-vacuum.

[sixsoxsex]

Mass cannot disappear but can only move or change into light energy. The movement speed through space can be at most equal to c. If a mass is transformed in light it take with it the fallen of graviti effect that is called gravitational wave.

[lightninlad]

One thing I do NOT understand about this space-time fabric thing…how does an object like a spherical planet cause space to warp such that the planets revolve around them in an ELLIPTICAL orbit?

My brain 🧠 is telling me that the warping of space should be UNIFORM and therefore cause circular orbits, not elliptical orbits.

[deonmcadams]

Based upon the fact that there will be a time lapse that will cause a chain of reactions to take place it will not happen all of a sudden alot like University time to mature up until this point