Gun Control Loss That Could Force an ATF Redo

preview_player
Показать описание
Range VS The Attorney General is a case that deals with misdemeanor disability of firearms ownership and the ATF Lost. A large potion of gun control plans hinge on the powers that be being able to take your weapons for the smallest thing. This case says that this approach does not hold up to the Bruen decision

Sources:
NY Times Article:
ABC News Article:

Armed and Nerded Podcast:

#vsogunchannel

The VSO Gun Channel is an educational resource of VSO Media LLC, a media production company, and VSOrdnance LLC, a research and development/ Testing Evaluation "contract lab". VSO is not in the business of selling or promoting the sale of firearms. Nothing VSO publishes should be misconstrued to support the sale of Firearms, components, or accessories. The VSO Gun Channel serves as a common sense, educational resource promoting responsible gun ownership and safety particularly for young minds otherwise negatively influenced by a fundamental breakdown of our society.

Unless otherwise stated, the subject matter of this video was provided by the manufacturer or another third party at no cost to us. In doing so, VSO reserves all creative rights, including the right to publish negative aspects it deems relevant to the representation of the product and its continuous improvement. VSO Gun Channel only publishes objective content related directly to tests performed by its personnel. While in-depth test results may be shared directly with manufacturers prior to official release, they must agree NOT to: impede VSO's work, attempt to undermine or alter our results, impugn or undermine our integrity, and must forfeit any expectation of being involved in the process. To be clear to our viewers, VSOrdnance LLC provides testing, evaluation, research, and product development consulting services to clients, for which it is compensated. It is solely at VSO's discretion whether or not to turn footage over to VSO Gun Channel for the publishing video derived from such tests and experience with these products. These are separate-No party may buy our opinion & No party may buy access to our audience even if it is their ulterior motive to do so by contracting the testing.

If you are interested in VSO's services you may submit an official inquiry via email to the contact email listed on channel the "about" page
Комментарии
Автор

The 2A is winning but those facts will be suppressed. Please consider interacting with the video to help fight that censorship and signal to the machine that people need to see this video

VSO_Gun_Channel
Автор

If its unconstitutional then it needs to be repealed.

raymondjallen
Автор

The Bruen decision should also be enough on its own to shoot down the ATF brace infringement.

xMrBlack
Автор

The Court ruled that they can't take weapons away from you for misdemeanors and non-violent felonies. That's the 5 second read.

Turboy
Автор

I've always wondered how getting a dwi justifies taking your gun rights. This law needs to go

Brett
Автор

This should apply for violent felons also. If someone has paid their debt to society, but we still feel they are too dangerous to be able to be on the streets they need to stay in prison.

JasonHenderson
Автор

It is about time this gets addressed. Non violent conviction should not take away a person's 2A nor voting rights.

cjsrescues
Автор

The majority says "FTATF". 😂

martycuhntzmart
Автор

I honestly feel like the VSO Gun Channel is MASSIVELY underrated. Always stoked to see you’ve upload something man, please keep up the great work you’re doing bro!

vqvxxcd
Автор

The concept of federal gun control supposes that the politicians in Washington are not criminals, or at least, not worse than the people whom they target. People who regularly kill thousands of people in other nations that haven't attacked us would seem to me to be more evil than the typical man or woman on the street. Are we to suppose that if you hold high government position, killing thousands of people in another country, for "our interests", is not criminal? Are these people fit to "control" our firearms?

rufus-hh
Автор

As much shit Trump deserved for what he did to Bump Stock ban, he did appoint 3 quality Justices to the Supreme Court who have been pro 2A so far. I wish they would have formal reviews of more gun cases, but believe they will eventually find the right case to review that encompasses many firearms disputes all in one case. Could easily see the NFA challenged in the Supreme Court. The Matt Hoover (CRS Case) could possibly rise to that level as well as the ATF Pistol Brace ruling currently involved in a few injunctions at a District Court level.

bryanduchane
Автор

This is an absolutely monumental decision.

nomorerainbows
Автор

It’s strange how local governments try to override federal laws with local ones only when it serves their purpose and visa versa

zeusmaster
Автор

Fantastic decision. One I have been saying for years.

sinclairpages
Автор

The amount of history that happens on June 6 is out F'n standing!!!!

dalek
Автор

Go VSO! F censorship, particularly censorship of true and just content that doesn't fit a particular agenda.

quickcanary
Автор

18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law...

urnaighean_shamhach
Автор

That intro countdown was pretty trippy. I really liked it.

mohamadyousef
Автор

Some courts are starting to follow Heller and NYSRPA case law. It's about time.

buckshotscott
Автор

1 year and 1 day Felony Jaywalking would be passed if they could get away with it.

musclesmouse
join shbcf.ru