Prosecutor: 'He Was Not Compliant with You? He Refused the PBT?' Cop: 'Yessir.' Jury: 'Not Guilty.'

preview_player
Показать описание
DUI Attorney Larry Forman defends a client who was accused of driving under the influence. In this episode, Larry questions the cop on the stand who eventually crumbles into a praying position. Watch the video all the way through to find out what happens to this DUI charge!

Grayson County, Kentucky.
September 10, 2018.

Judge: Honorable Kenneth H. Goff II, Grayson County District Court Division D
Defense attorney: Larry Forman, a.k.a. the DUI Guy
Prosecutor: Clay Ratley
Arresting Officers: Brandon Rafferty and Donald Cain, City of Leitchfield Police Department

Watch More Videos From This Case:
4/7 Embarrassing a Cop Under Oath: Prosecutor has to Rescue him Multiple Times; Jurors Very Annoyed

Join this channel to get access to perks:

NEED TO BEAT A DUI? I CAN BE YOUR LAWYER, TOO.

Call 502-931-6788 OR

Let's work to get your DUI case resolved!

Connect With the DUI Guy:

#criminaldefenseattorney #duidefenselawyer #duiattorney
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

"On the advice of council, I will not submit to a PBT."

laanyan
Автор

Compliance or Violence. That's the modern day police motto. And blue line backers love that shit.

greebuh
Автор

Wow that’s an insane definition of compliant and explains a lot when the officer agreed. I would think compliant means follow all laws and LAWFUL orders.

jonnybaze
Автор

Compliant means you give up your constitutional rights when asked to?What a clown 🤣

BrooklynBalla
Автор

Prosecutor logic is like leaded drinking water

samsungtelevision
Автор

I was jonesing for the DUI Guy. This one looks good. Cant wait for more to come.

robertbascelli
Автор

Clearly that shows they believe you aren’t compliant if you choose not to do something that you aren’t required to do.
Prosecutor was badgering his own witness.

TBagr
Автор

"A compliant person does everything you ask." -Tyrants

anagramconfirmed
Автор

I think this cop has been previously owned by The DUI Guy.

Wordsley
Автор

A compliant person doesnt stand on their rights they do as the government says. Boy what problems that has caused us in the last 2 years

tylerbailey
Автор

If he was "complaint" he wouldn't of taken this to trail

johndoe
Автор

Hmm, wonder what would happen if you said you couldn't physically do the dui physical test and offered to do the breathalyzer test and just didn't blow. Every time the officer said "you need to blow in the machine" and you said "all right. Let me try again" and no matter how many time they tell you to blow you just didn't blow.

mekrobar
Автор

Was there questions in the persecutors testimony anywhere??

LucasJackson_
Автор

Compliant only if it’s necessary. Not because you state

brainpain
Автор

He was compliant with not taking the PBT.

Taking the PBT is a yes or no question.. so either answer is being compilant.

canisdeumnox
Автор

The prosecutor gave the win to the DUI Guy with his questioning. Easy win.

ameenodat
Автор

You rock. We need more lawyers like you.

aprilmoore
Автор

When the police bring you to the station to blow in their machine you will always blow over the limit even if you were sober because they would have to bring you back to the scene and bring your car back I had one beer and a hamburger And I blew three times over the legal limit

johnmcneil
Автор

The 5th amendment says nobody has to comply.

patriotjoe
Автор

Example for: police is conspiracy theory

lazevankov