Nobel Laureate Warns! JWST Has Just Discovered That Strange Things Are Happening in the Universe!

Nobel Laureate Warns! JWST Has Just Discovered That Strange Things Are Happening in the Universe!
Welcome to EYES 200M, your portal to captivating explorations in Space, Science, and Technology!

Within EYES 200M, our diverse team collaborates seamlessly, blending the skills of writers, voice actors, video editors, animation artists, and graphic designers. Each video undergoes an extensive journey, spanning days of meticulous crafting before it finds its place on YouTube for your enjoyment.

While our videos prioritize creativity and dedication, it's essential to understand that they are not crafted for academic citation or research purposes. Instead, they are tailored for pure entertainment, free from the confines of formal peer review. EYES 200M operates independently, distinct from any other YouTube channel.

We invite you to join our community of enthusiasts and stay updated on our latest releases by subscribing to our channel. Your support fuels our passion for exploration and creation.

Your feedback is invaluable to us. We eagerly anticipate your thoughts and comments on our content.

[WaltC]

Very good summation...the narrator is one of the very best, btw! I've always thought that the infinite universe was in the beginning space, and that there were several "big bangs", so to speak, that happened simultaneously, or at staggered intervals, so that the apparent differences in red/blue shift velocities that we see to indicate differences in expansion are created by the angular momentum of the matter that came out of the various big bangs--located at different origin points and even possibly at different times. To me, suggesting that there must be a single bang is no more likely or predictable than a multiple of such events, as we can explain neither...;)

[thekingofmojacar]

STRANGE things happen in the universe? Yes, of course, but I think it's more about us humans simply not knowing what to analize at certain points. On the other hand, we living beings are simply irrelevant, we certainly cannot influence the universe...
I assume that our universe functions cyclically (4 cycles: infant universe - expanding universe - retracting universe - final collapse) and after a complete cycle (the 4 listed here = complete process) the universe renews itself.
But we do not know how this overall or holistic process began, we can only speculate that there is no way for us humans to look back several complete universe cycles (previous universes), we simply have to accept that!
Our consciousness here in this individual life experience is limited, our main task lies somewhere completely different - SURVIVAL and that we must learn to PROTECT and treat our planet, nature and other living beings with LOVE, respect and solidarity!
And then (after life) we dive back into this infinitely large universe until, at some point, we are thrown back into another individual life adventure... 🐒

[luceatlux]

What if the reality we witness is just one single rotating whole structure... ie, speed-gravity?
We know that each attribute dictates the others and you can mess with this; you can turn one thing up or down and see the other things fluctuate accordingly (the absolute-extremes of each attribute is utterly determined by the limitations of the other parts in relation, naturally).
We're just seeing different attributes based on a perspective-snap-shot at any one frame of reference of a structure that is simply naturally in motion (or, "rotating, " if it helps to illustrate it like that in your mind).

From our perspective, we see an occulted partial glimpse of a simple whole at any one frame, depending on where we look... and as it rotates, it evolves and appears to evolve/change (because when you affect part of this singular thing, it affects the other parts in relation, naturally). It appears complex and like some gigantic complex unfolding. But we're really just seeing a tiny frame at a time of a simple structure in motion.

So, instead of the expression of reality being something linear or repeating or time being the single stable attribute with which we TRY to stabilize and measure/understand ALL, time is just one minor part of a whole that's just a structure in a simple revolution.

(So it's like a single computer program where you set one variable and you see all the others get affected.. you can move this or that value up or down and as time moves, there is an associated change, just as if you move another attribute, you can see time itself change, etc.)

there are, of course, thngs we can't currently see because there are new expressions of reality that form during conditions in evolution that aren't currently being experienced from our side.
The way this seemingly-infinite Rube Goldberg device keeps in motion is just by fluctuating and generating evolutions which offsets things, creates different imbalances, and manifests other expressions of "reality" at any one "time."

[staceykeyes]

Space time = the expansion of space is time … without expansion there would be no distortion of time near massive bodies . Space may have expanded at different rates therefore time passed at different rates

[MainooMadness]

We are wrong we need to be looking towards frequency and vibrations, the very action of vibration positively charges and the harmonic waves have mass. Action and reaction we either change this law of fundamental physics or change our math. We can't have it both ways

[oliveirlegume]

The only thing we can observe out there is light. Then we infer mass. But it does not explain us what we see. Then we rely on models. What are we missing at largest distances ?

[Duke]

no matter (no pun intend) its impossible for something to derive from nothing!

[wess]

Obviously it is a paradox - we are not circling the sun, as a bug does not circle a light, we and it go in a straight line keeping the light source above. Light is the inertial observer. But gravity makes it appear to us as circular. Gravity is causal reality experienced by us as time - but is just us falling through this - whatever it is - a dimension?

[kennethcole]

Space is not itself it’s not anything it’s just measurement between two objects is a space between me and my TV set If there is a fabric of space then there’s no space . time is the measurement between events if there are no events, there’s no time. Einstein’s paper.on special relativity and a problem with space states for one object there is no space or time.

[hockng]

Hey! Infinity is a mathematical concept, not a physics one. I used to have a PhD in maths 45 years ago (topology and a little of geometry) so I should know. I know nothing about physics formally but I understand infinity better than most physicists. Even though there is overlap, maths and physics are two different games. Mathematical logic and foundation of maths have little to do with physics. There is a theory that our physical universe is a real part of some complex (as in complex variables) universe with spiritual realms being the imaginary part. But who knows. It is mysticism and it is religion so it is not part of your conversation. It universe could have consciousness, then it would explain a lot. But that is not part of physics for now.

[ckennedy]

I think we are in more danger from so called intellectuals tbh

[JuniorMason-mz]

The black people are the Gods the world is run by a family

[JuniorMason-mz]

NASA what happens to the black man you destroy and spread the body over the earth

[JuniorMason-mz]

Same news every app stop it and speak the truth to the people

[TRVBAL]

this is all horribly conjectural. a lot of the script is inaccurate and very many bold statements are said with no evidence, or seemily any intelligence whatsoever.