NEET UG 2024 Results Explained: How Did Students Score 718?

#creditcardtips #financialadvice #love #manageyourcredit #song #lovesong #rap
NEET UG 2024 Results Explained: How Did Students Score 718?NEET UG 2024 Result Declared: NTA Explains How Students Scored 718, 719 MarksNEET UG Result 2024 Released: The National Testing Agency (NTA) declared the results of the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test Undergraduate (NEET UG 2024) on June 4, 2024. This year, a total of 67 candidates have achieved NEET All India Rank (AIR) 1 with a percentile score of 99.997129. Many students and teachers have raised questions about how anyone can score 718 marks, stating that it is impossible. After 720, you can only score 716 marks and 718 marks is not possible.

The NTA has issued a clarification on this. NTA said that candidates who reported losing time during the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test Undergraduate (NEET UG 2024) have been given grace marks.

“NTA received few representations and Court Cases from the candidates of NEET (UG) 2024 raising concerns of loss of time during the conduct of the examination on 05.05.2024. Such cases/representations were considered by NTA and the normalisation formula, which has been devised and adopted by the Hon'ble Apex Court, vide its Judgment dated 13.06.2018, was implemented to address the loss of time faced by the candidates of NEET (UG) 2024,” the NTA said.

“The loss of examination time was ascertained and such candidates were compensated with grace marks. So, the candidate's marks can be 718 or 719 also,” the NTA explained.The first born daughter is always the female version of her fatherperson to the false cases filed by the defendant society. (11). The defendant society filed the above false cases, filed false affidavits, produced fabricated documents ... fraudulent act against the defendant herein and she is falsely alleging that the defendant has filed a false complaint against her on the basis
Bangalore District Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Smt. Shanti Devi vs Shri Rajpati on 2 July, 2010
accused Rajpati stated that the complainant had filed the present false case against him and his family members including his minor sons and daughter just ... stated that the present was a false case and he had been falsely implicated and false complaint lodged against him. He stated that his children
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Ms.Arokia Mary Lucia vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 13 February, 2004
reasonable compensation to the petitioner for the foisting of the false case against her and also direct the 7th respondent to pay the amount ... register the case on the complaint of the petitioner immediately, but in a relaxed manner, after registering the above false case against the petitioner under
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 13 - V Kanagaraj - Full Document
Gurmail Singh vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 7 January, 2022
false case against the complainant, but said 'S' refused to do so and got registered the rape case i.e. case 307/2020 ... threatened that in case, the said amount is not paid, then a false rape case will again be registered against the complainant. On the basis
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 0 - V Bahl - Full Document