Ice Age in 30 years - 1 The Primer Fields

[wanaitu.]

Great video Rolf, Thanks. See Diehold foundation, suspicious observers and thunderbolts project on you tube for more info. What happened to David Le Point ?

[kenanacampora]

Herr WITZSCHE, guten Morgan. I very much enjoyed your lecture and research. I appreciate your efforts to explain these things in English. You could have easily just spoken German. The Primer Field series by Physist LaPoint led me to you and your excellent presentation, charts, graphs, and explanation. Thank you again. Have an outstanding day and stay warm!

[seachangeau]

I hope this finds you well. have you seen the anode tufts created by the electric sun physical model based on the birkeland terrella by SAFIRE project?

[K_Dallas]

do we have evidence of other stars suddenly turning on and off?

[mentalcompassno]

That photo of the desert was so beautiful

[newperspective]

good day mr witzsche...i have started to watch the fascinating documentaries you have produced and have previously enjoyed watching davids assessments...

this information jumped out at me as a fundamental case for the forces gravity electricity and magnetism....
it also occurred to me that motive force in the vacuum of space had no formula to describe the motive forces...

m = mass
h = motion
i = vacuum
CF1 = higher potential magnetism/gravity/electricity
CF2= lessthanCF1 potential magnetism/gravity/electricity

(i(h)) = CF1(<<m>)CF2

a body cannot not act upon itself in a vacuum...
which incidentally nasa claims a body ...can... act upon itself in the vacuum ...ie rockets ...


in nasas own terminology rockets use recoil force to propel themselves... they completely disregard joules second law...and have to because the air is too thin.

the ONLY motive force in a vacuum is magnetism/gravity /electricity...

Nasa misrepresents newtons third law by arguing that the mass of gas or exhaust is the second reactive body in F=ma
F= reaction inside rocket
m= gas leaving the rocket
a= relative motion
By definition of joules second law gas cannot exist in a vacuum without a containing(primer feild) force therefore do no work which cancels ""m"" which negates ""a"" the rocket now is only subject to it own inertia and velocity...the propellant cannot interact with the vacuum so fails to push..

A soon as the rocket leaves the atmospheric envelope the rocket cannot do work
the recoil effect is two systems the gun and the bullet the external force is the gunpowder required by newtons third law to act upon each other equally...a rocket is NOT.. it is a singular system WITHOUT an external force....so newtons third law is inadmissible...

i would like to hear your thoughts on this best regards....

[martynphipps]

Dear Rolf, your scientific presentations are works of monumental scholarship, but will humanity have the sense to appreciate your god given gifts?I doubt it.yours Dr Martyn Phipps

[paulnotdownunder]

You are close, understand FE concept, the dome and what the sun and moon really are. The revelation you might blow your mind.

[zachjett]

Why has David not won a novel prize? Has he discovered their weakness real science

[riffmaj]

I tried to listen carefully but, it seems you either have too much bass, or your too close to the mic that I can't understand  what your say.

[davemeeks]

If the center of our star is not nuclear, then what drives the center of the earth?

if this is a critical message to learn and understand, it would help to have it narrated in plain English. The heavy accent is too distractive,