Creating an Array of Values in One Column by Overlap in Another Column: A Practical SQL Guide

Discover how to consolidate user session data in SQL by leveraging array overlap to create unique identifiers. Master the `ARRAY_AGG` technique for seamless data representation.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Can I create an array of values in one column, based on array overlaps in another column?

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Introduction: The Challenge of Data Consolidation

In the ever-evolving landscape of data management, consolidating datasets to illustrate user interactions can pose quite the challenge. A common scenario involves two datasets where users have multiple sessions, each represented by unique identifiers. If you have reached the point where you can use ARRAY_AGG to aggregate unique identifiers into arrays, congratulations! However, what comes next can be tricky: how do you merge these arrays based on overlaps? If you are stuck at this juncture, worry not! This guide will walk you through the process of consolidating data for clear and comprehensive analysis.

Understanding the Source Data

Let's take a look at our starting point. The initial dataset consists of three columns Session_GUID, User_GUID, and Interaction_GUID, represented as follows:

Session_GUIDUser_GUIDInteraction_GUIDSession_1User_1Interact_ASession_1User_1Interact_BSession_1User_2Interact_CSession_2User_2Interact_DSession_3User_3Interact_CSession_4User_4Interact_EUsing the following SQL query, we can aggregate this data by session:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This results in organized data like:

SessionUser_GUID_ArrayInteraction_GUID_ArraySession_1[ User_1, User_2 ][ Interact_A, Interact_B, Interact_C ]Session_2[ User_2 ][ Interact_D ]Session_3[ User_3 ][ Interact_C ]Session_4[ User_4 ][ Interact_E ]The challenge now is to aggregate these arrays based on overlaps—specifically, to group sessions where either the user or interaction IDs match.

Proposed Solution: Utilizing Recursive CTE

To achieve the desired outcome, we can create a user-defined table function (UDTF) that processes overlapping groupings. Here’s a breakdown of the approach:

Step 1: Create the UDTF

This function will evaluate whether the current row's arrays have overlapping elements with previously seen arrays. Here's how it works:

Initialize Grouping: A function keeps track of two array dimensions to hold user IDs and interaction IDs properly.

Process Rows: It checks for overlaps and either assigns the current group number or creates a new one if no matches are found.

Here’s the function code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Important Note: The UDTF works well with smaller partitions (a few thousand rows), so we need to ensure that partitions are manageable.

Step 2: Create Temporary Table and Insert Values

Create a temporary table for our data and insert the initial values:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 3: Aggregate Using the Groups

We will create common table expressions (CTEs) to group the data based on array overlaps, using the UDTF defined earlier.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion: Analyzing the Results

When executed correctly, the above code yields consolidated groupings based on overlaps in both user IDs and interaction IDs, resulting in data structured as follows:

SESSION_GUIDSUSER_GUIDSINTERACTION_GUIDS[ "Session_1", "Session_2" ][ "User_1", "User_2" ][ "Interact_A", "Interact_B", "Interact_D" ][ "Session_4" ][ "User_4" ][ "Interact_E" ]This structured approach not only demonstrates the power of SQL in merging datasets based on complex conditions but also helps maintain clarity in data analysis.

With the right tools and a bit of ingenuity, consolidating user session data has never been easier. Happy querying!