We Might Have Just Found a Hidden Force of Nature

We might have just discovered the fifth fundamental force of nature. The latest results from a quantum experiment show there’s a hidden force in nature. These results were obtained after studying the decay of the beauty quarks from the LHCb experiment at CERN. If they turn out to be true, there could be a new force in nature besides gravity, electromagnetic force, weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force. The standard model is our best model to explain the ingredients of the universe. It unifies three of the four known forces but leaves out gravity. Although it’s a masterpiece in itself, the standard model is incomplete. That’s why we need to expand its scope and account for the inconsistencies in theory.

Created by: Rishabh Nakra
Narrated by: Jeffrey Smith

#quantumphysics #particlephysics

[garyz]

It does not inspire to hear the narrator state at the onset of the video that the universe is governed by four known fundamental forces, the first being...gravity. He even spoke about gravity in completely Newtonian terms (while images of GR gravitational waves fill the screen). It felt Orwellian.) Later, he briefly states that Einstein "better described gravity, " but he continues to insists that it's one of the four fundamental forces of nature. Einstein didn't fine-tune Classical physics; he replaced the theory offering a totally new understanding of gravity explaining that it's not a force at all. Later they get to the exiting part, but they sloppily talk about the issue, stating that there's "a new force out there" rather than "a newly discovered force" and only mention it briefly before signing off. I thought that portion of the video would take up most of what they had to share but it was almost just mentioned in passing. This video's title claims to be cutting edge, and it just came out, but it is poorly put worded and technically incorrect, IMO.

[davidhall]

I was waiting for a sentence like, "and this might be the fifth fundamental force of nature." Something to tie it all up. However, you dug down into the nitty-gritty of subatomic physics and just stopped after a while. I'm left with my head between an electron and a muon and nowhere to go.

[brianvalenti]

If you want linear results, be sure to only take 2 data points.

[arieloxford]

It genuinely made me smile that you used the Truth/Beauty Quark nomenclature, rather than Top/Bottom. I've always thought it was much more poetic...

[PhysxXSpace]

The universe never cease to amaze us. There's a lot to learn. We humans are tiny creatures and our lifespan is like a heartbeat when it comes to the vastness of the universe.

[Dev-bkxt]

No other feeling is as special as skygazing around 2 to while hearing the interstellar hanz zimmer track you'll literally get a spark in a form of questions that pop up in ur mind that vibe is amazing ...

[NondescriptMammal]

Um... I thought relativity says that gravity isn't a force at all?

[Acidwavebrah]

Nice that you mention the electric aspect of the solar system and universe. As this gives the simplest and clearest explanation of how our universe works.

[phillyg]

Unifying the forces is not adding another one, it’s realizing that we have misinterpreted the present ones and they are all one of the same. All these subatomic particles always break down into electrons in photons, the foundation is Electromagnetism.

[WildStar]

'Beauty' quark, much more commonly called 'Bottom' quark.

[fredbassett]

isn't a force....its an effect caused by the curvature of space time ...

[johnhodge]

I suggest the Theory of Everything will describe how one(1) force evolves into the 4. That is, fewer forces.

[joserserrano]

The decimal system is efficient but not every civilization on Earth has used that system.
MesoAmericans devised a system that meshed the concept of interaction at Five. That is why their basic numbers were four dots with a bar at five.
Initially, with a square of five times five (or five each of which contains five), they meshed the 1st and 5th which reduced a count of twenty-five to twenty. A square at the base of a pyramid or a number squared might be enlightening. On graph paper, in a 1:5 ratio, a second related column would read twenty-six (25 + 1) and would split in half at 13. Using symbols and signs, 20 x 13 was their Sacred part of the system which was also related to 20 x 18. A Long Count of their system of symbols ended (or restarted) after104 years. Applying concepts of that system in 3-D they built the largest sundial (You Are Here) on Earth at Chichen Itza.

[mr.scientist]

It was really interesting 🔥
Thank you 🙏

[RelaxMode]

We are getting closer day by day to "The Theory of Everything" but we still don't know how far it is.

[paradisemusiclibrary]

We overestimate what we can do in a day, and underestimate what we can do in a year. If you wrote 1pg a day, in 1 year you'll have an entire book. 💖🙏

[packratswhatif.]

I just dont think that the universe is going to give up her secrets that quickly.

[mikefromspace]

Lepton universality IS a result of progressive kinetics; my theory which is generally unified. Since unification means "To unify the forces", I have done this using projective geometry which is the logical root of all geometries. Everything is a differential of 3 poles, matter being the 3rd. Time is the flow opposition of mass vs energy as Ice Cube validated for me. Maybe it's time I wrote a paper to submit. Nobody seems to really care though. Job security.

[bluesky]

Random question, are there organic pigs?

[hatemzainel-abedeen]

hello, if i have an amazing hypothesis about the origin of the universe, the what was before, how the big bang happened, the structure of the universe and some other ideas
so how can i certify and introduce these hypothesis to keep my writes