Daughters will not get Right in Property | Daughter's Right to Property

preview_player
Показать описание
Daughters will NOT get a share in their Father's Property in certain situations.

Watch this video to discover-

- What are the 3 cases in which Daughters do NOT get a right to Father's or Mother's Property?
- Ancestral Property v Self-acquired Property
- What about Partitions before 20th December 2004?
- What if Daughter gives up her share?

#womensrights #righttoproperty #partition

Don't miss this out!

🔥 Want to Talk to Me Directly?

🔔 Subscribe for helpful legal tips, tricks and info:

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

📹Our Best Videos :

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

🚀 ABOUT RAMANA REDDY

Ramana Reddy is a practicing Advocate in the High Court of Telangana.

He helps people in Telangana resolve disputes by avoiding needless costly consequences.

He is on a mission to explain legal information in a simple and straightforward manner.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

🚀 LINKS

Follow Ramana Reddy on Instagram:

Follow me on Facebook:

Subscribe to #1 YouTube channel for legal information:

WhatsApp:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

First of all.... Very thankful🙏🙏🙏.... What an excellent overall complete communication skill... Body language.... Facial expression.... Point to point.... With graphics sketch.... Message at bottom high lighting.... With very important supporting CITATION.... Very nice of you.... Absolutely you are professional with service minded ethics.... Not only junior advocates even sr. Advocates must and should watch.... Please maintain same quality sir... Don't forget supporting I'm from karnataka.... 😊

socialworker
Автор

As per my knowledge not only ancestral but property left behind by father which is known as property left intestate without any arrangement by means of Will, In such condition all legal heirs including daughters have equal rights .

rekharsni
Автор

Even a son does not have right to his father’s property that he ( father) has made during his lifetime. It’s father’s wish whom he gives it to.

CharanjeetSohi-qhdh
Автор

The way you are telling the case is very useful AND clear and interesting sir

ankireddypeddyreddy
Автор

Boy and girl r same she should get by birth no father or mother can stop to not give her
Fathers many times before death deprive her coz of the pressure of the son or old mind set
Ancestors property or self acquired should be given to all the kids

SA-ixnm
Автор

Also our father purchased 1 plot from the company, on 13/09/2007 the company also issued a "lease and purchase deed" in which it is written "10 years non-assignment to anyone" Our father's lease term is 10 years on 06/01/2010 while still in Hawaii. A will is written(daughter), the will is not registered, referred to by Stempeter, what are the grounds in any law in the framework of the law?

SANDEEPAS-tq
Автор

What if Father expired in year 1978 and mother and son take transfer
In municipal records in year 2000 and excluded the daughter.
After the demise of mother in year 2018 again mutation filed by son for change of name is it legally correct that daughter again claim her right in property without any will.

ankitverma
Автор

Respected advocate sir, there are two perspectives or probably more. What happens in case daughter has been given share in self acquired property at the time of marriage & later the parent has passed away intestate. Can the lady demand further redistribution of property amongst the remaining self acquired property? In this case the remaining children of the deceased parent has more to lose. Please throw some light on these facts.

rohanrajah
Автор

I see in so many comments that sons are getting greedy and want to deny property to women oike their aunts and sisters.

alishamini
Автор

It's funny how many videos are about in which cases daughter DO NOT have right to property...rather than focusing on when she has right to property....

razm
Автор

Sir this is what been overruled in Arunachala Gounder vs Ponnusamy case by Apex court as to that of Self acquired property women also can cliam share as well the share can be acquired irrespective of the partition year..kindly clarify.Thank you.

jpriyasai
Автор

Even the company has issued the lease and purchase deed, our father has written the will while the lease is in force, what should we do next?

SANDEEPAS-tq
Автор

A property was gifted to my grandfather by his maternal aunt. Then is it called self acquired or ancestral ?? Can my aunt demand their rights in the property ??

sanjaysen
Автор

sorry for asking doubt sir but i saw many videos and read on google that daughter has right on father's property irrespective of ancestral property or self acquired property. writing will is secondary matter. if generally asking daughter has same right as son in fathers property. this is what i understood pls correct me sir if i m wrong. asking u with all respect sir .🙏🙏

sandeepprajapati
Автор

What if the family has no son? Who will claim the self acquired property?

passer-by
Автор

You are telling the actual thing thanq so much for your credibility

ankireddypeddyreddy
Автор

Pl clarify if the so called self earned property is earned with the mixup of ancestral property income. It resolve many queries. Thanks

pratapbhanur
Автор

Hello Sir,
My father had a self acquired property. He passed away in the year 1978 without making a will. The entire property was transferred only to my mother. Then in the the year 2000, my mother partitioned the said property only between sons without giving any share to the daughters and the partition deed was registered.
Now in the year 2023, daughters are trying to claim a share in the property. Is their claim valid?
Wont be there any limitation for such claim as they already had knowledge of such partition and kept quiet for 23 years?

victorlsequeira
Автор

My SIL got 400+ grams of gold as gift during her marriage and she is asking for equal rights in parents gold and property after my husband’s parents death. What can we do in this situation?

thanutp
Автор

When did Article 14 of the constitution come into existence? which says " All are equal before law and equal protection of law irrespective of caste, sex, etc., prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth..."...This constitutional Article came into existence in year 1950 i.e. after independence. 20 December 2004 was the time to light up sensation to realise the sentence - All are equal before law, and equal protection of law irrespective of sex, caste, etc. prohibition of discrimination on grounds of sex, caste, etc. This Article 14 was applied after 55 years of its existence which is almost one generation lifetime, so late. One generation females have already cried whole of their life for not getting any right in property after taking birth on this earth, even inside the house which also is considered to be a property. So bad. After such one generation cry, she should be allowed to open or reopen partitions or decrees before 20 Dec 2004 without thinking it to be huge burden saying many females will come in huge quantity. But no, only needy will come who really needs. Daughter's will never really don't feel disturbing their brother's settled life if affection, trust, love as essential essence of life exists between them. So, the judiciary need not worry about such burden as it is not going to work overtime. We are ready to wait for results even untill the last stage of our life and / or after our lifetime to leave some property for our next generation and we going dying with no right on this earth piece even after taking birth on this earth. Arey laws are made for trees passers only after staying for 12 years and we females being free servants as daughter's in father's house and as daughter in law in father in law's house, we are dragged out of houses as house is transferred or written in will deed to someone else and the Indian female is left over shelterless without roof and floor and if you see last year's ( year 2022) statistics regarding rape rate in India is 84:per day. The person who has said and declared it to be burden to solve litigation created if partitions before 20:Dec 2004:allowed to open should take back his utterance of declaration, the solution for which I have already explained

pavip