How The Simulation Functions

NOTE: The perspectives expressed by guests don't necessarily mirror my own. There's a versicolored arrangement of people on TOE, each harboring distinct viewpoints, as part of my endeavor to understand the perspectives that exist.

THANK YOU: To Mike Duffey for your insight, help, and recommendations on this channel.

Support TOE:

Follow TOE:

Join this channel to get access to perks:

[paaao]

If this is a simulation, then kudos to the dude who programmed the whole dinasour mystery in. Completely unnecessary, but the attention to detail really is convincing.

[pugix]

The word REALITY is a trigger word. It's used in many different contexts. The 'real world' means that you have to go to work. Reality means that when you describe your experiences, other people agree that they have similar ones. If you have an experience (of a UFO, say) that the next person never had, that person may question if what you experienced was REAL. The reality vs experience question is a very old philosophical question. Is there something behind experience? Is experience only appearance? Appearance of something mysterious? The WILL, as Schopenhauer said? Or atoms in the void, as Democritus said? The particles we hear tell of? A simulation is a kind of imitation, isn't it? The only way we know what a simulation is, is by also experiencing what it's a simulation of. To say we live in a simulation is to say we live in non-reality. But how can that mean anything unless we also know what the reality is?

[hypergraphic]

If you can accept the possibility that we live in a simulation, then then it's not that much of a stretch to imagine that we are living in the mind of God or in a simulation created by God.

[fore_bears]

The lengths we’ll go to avoid the spiritual world

[michelstronguin]

He got one point wrong, the first point is true, but the second isn't: 1. We can't know we aren't in a simulation - this statement is true. 2. If we are in a simulation, nothing is real - this statement is false. Fix - If we are in a simulation there is only one thing we can know for sure, and that is that reality itself is real. We may be in base reality, or we might not be in base reality, but in both cases we know that reality must exist. Reality needs to be running our simulation if we are in a simulation, and if we are not in a simuation, reality also must be real since we are in it.

[aujax]

ok. maybe its a simulation. but so what? we still have to live it just the same. doesnt make any difference

[coopersavva]

Whenever we talk about simulation theory, one thing that bugs me is we only discuss it as a digital technology. Maybe we need to open this idea up to ideas of biological tech or even other means.

[RogerioLupoArteCientifica]

No one ever hints the hypothesis that if this is true, the simulation could be self-imposed rather than originated by evil beings or any other beings.

If that’s the case, we can indeed investigate and test the hypothesis and find evidence that we are in a simulation.

I mean if the simulation is self-imposed, then we can play and experiment with our own mind and our states of consciousness to try to achieve some intentional results in the outer world. That’s exactly what advanced Yogis do and teach.

Moreover, even if the simulation is not self-imposed, one has to take into account the hypothesis that the power of the mind can take over and so we could collect good results when testing that hypothesis.

Of course mainstream scientists and philosophers don’t think this is a question, as they’re mostly physicalists.

[lopiklop]

Something I always think of in this regard is that the entertainment industry is becoming more and more relevant and has more and more funds than ever. I suspect that trend could only increase with time. Why wouldn't this so-called simulation be based entirely on entertainment? Even right now, we're watching this on an entertainment platform.

[paulioc]

If we are living in a simulation, what difference does it make? Does it change anything at all?

[theomnisthour]

You already had proof of the simulation hypothesis last year - doubling of the age of the universe. Gonna double again this year once you find the right spiral galaxy

[Bleach_Tonic]

why does it always have to be a "computer" sim? Maybe it's actually a biological sim of sorts, where it's 3D atoms or molecules, instead of 2D DPI...?

[mr.c]

Only those who write books or teach give a shit about this bullshit. The rest of us just want to pay the bills and take a vacation.

[zwarst]

There are only 3 models of REALIY that explain night & day.

1- Spinning balls - Helio or Geo-centrism.
2- Horizontal circles - Pizza Dome-ism.
3- Virtual Realm - Equidistant Circles Based on Latitude.

We live in a virtual realm, and the map (coordinate system) is stereographic. The plane of Earth is fixed & immovable. There is no curvature, no gravity, no dome, and no ice wall...

Earth has 4 corners and 2 polar rotations. All of the luminaries in the sky are being rendered locally to each individual observer's circle of sight (eyes, cameras, etc.)...

The only working map and model of REALITY - Stereographic co-ordinate system by Awake Souls. Look up video -"Stereographic virtual reality EXPLAINED! How the only working map and model of REALITY works".

[jl-dqch]

Let's take it a step further...

You assume, you think there for you are but how do you think about something without first having the thought to think about something?

So what comes first, the thought or intention of thought?

Going a step further, if the thought of intention proceeds the thought then how is thinking possible unless our thoughts are not actually our thoughts? Think of it like photons of light going into your eyes and creating an image of the stuff it collided with on its way to you. You can direct your eyes like your intentions to view thoughts in a particular "direction". Or even like casting a line where the fish you want to catch are located.

This line of reasoning suggests that thoughts are things we observe not create and the kind of thoughts/thinking is influenced by the intention going in.

[Imam__AlMahdi]

Man made next generation 5G frequency, light and dark matter simulation

[miraculixxs]

Corollary: To any simulated entity everything that happens in the simulation is real

[bkinstler]

How is the simulation hypothesis descriptively adequate, or explanatorily adequate, or predictively adequate?

[LionKimbro]

Dream hypothesis: the world is a dream. Observe that on any given rotation of the Earth, there are tens of billions of dreams had. So given one world, there are an endless number of dreams. So the vast majority of worlds are dreams. Why would we think this world was not itself a dream?

[mrspook]

I believe the whole consciousness and ghost things because of my own experiences. And the answer if we are living in a situation is probably both yes and no. If you imagine the universe as a density gradient you can put the non local singularity where everything branches out from as being most chaotic and less solid but then it starts organizing and becoming thought forms and then starts becoming localized in space until a physical object or matter. It's difficult to explain but everything you know was creating through naturally occurring programming in the consciousness field. That's how I believe it works so I think that yes the universe is real but everything you see is also both figuratively and literally all your imagination and your the computer.