Prince Harry and Meghan interview: Reaction from CTV News' royal commentator

CTV News' Royal Commentator Richard Berthelsen reacts to Prince Harry and Meghan's interview with Oprah Winfrey.


Connect with CTV News:

---
CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.

[alisons]

More holes in their story than a strainer. Malignant narcissist, ticks every box.

[clarahr]

I don't believe Meghan. Her credibility is for me 0. In the past Harry used to be my fav royal, now I am disappointed.

[rikright]

Sorry, got zero sympathy for her/them, she's playing the victim, makes me sick...

[MartineSerge]

After listen princess Diana in her interview more than 30 years ago, everything that was expressed by Megan and Harry are not new at all

[briechilli]

Poor Harry is such a foolish boy. She on the other hand is a seriously manipulative individual. Dangerous combo as a couple.

[americaninparis]

Narcs NEVER EVER commit suicide.. She is a bad actress.. Didn't you know?

[annamyer]

So quick to investigate Megan and the bullying but not a peep about Prince Andrews sex scandal. Protect one and throw the other under the bus. Don't blame them for leaving or sharing their stories.

[BBakerStreet]

"Very disturbing to hear that part of the interview". In other words, not really sure I believe what she's saying.

[lucielu]

Where was Harry during her depression?

[toso]

Who cares? I mean, who really cares? Don't you have anything better to cover on this planet?

[junepwoo]

Harry should read Wallis Simpson's biography - it would give him some insights of what's in store for him at the hands of Meghan

[mariakoum]

HARRY COULD NOT HELP HIS WIFE TO FIND A

[sheldonvandal]

I have had some shite jobs in my life, but I have never had the worst job ever...Royal Correspondent.

[fegrace_]

Wow, this guy was “uncomfortable”, imagine how “uncomfortable” Meghan who lived through it was? Listening to his rambling on about being confused was irritating because comprehension is key:
1. Megan said she asked for help and was told she wasn’t an employee of the Royal Palace, and Harry Confirmed.
2. Megan said, that they wanted to change the the conference rule that would not allow Archie to become a prince! And they didn’t want to give him security although they were aware of threats on their lives!

I can go on but clearly his role is to be an apologist for the Royal Family so selective hearing clearly was his mode of operation!

[jamesgfraser]

Just because someone says something doesn't mean it's true. Madam Malarchy is a proven liar and I take what she says with a grain of salt.

[nb]

You have to wonder why they wanted to remain part-time working royals if they felt this way!

[noellarash]

Wow....the interview has finally aired... hope MM & H take a break & live their “private” life now

[michaelvanchu]

Here’s the issue I have. A lot of focus has been that someone raised the question of the colour of Meghan’s child’s skin. Kamala Harris is biracial. I am CERTAIN a conversation went on in the Biden camp about how that would play out politically. Was that conversation racist? Are Joe Biden or members of his staff racist?

[jackdaniels]

At least this guy was stating how some of the interview did not add up, not much of that in uk, only pier morgan and he has now been fired, also the chief of editors here has also had to step down as he asked for evidence, crazy times now

[christosp.tsonis]

Canada is a member of Commonwealth: The Governor General represents the Queen of England at the federal level in Canada. What obligation do the hard working Canadian taxpayers have to pay for the expenses of the Governor General? Is it too difficult for Canada to cut the umbilical cord between Canada and mother England? Are we still living in the age of Patricians and Plebeians?