Greatest Bowlers of All-time in Test Cricket | Top 20

preview_player
Показать описание
#cricket #testcricket #bowlers #fastbowling #spinners
Please note that the number of wickets taken by Alan Donald should be corrected as 330
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Fred Trueman, Joal Garner Michael Holding and Waqar Younis all ranked below Dale Steyn ? In your dreams !! No Kapel Dev ? He took all those wickets on slow flat pitches in India. As a bowler Kapel Dev very underrated.

jahno
Автор

Very Very Controversial topics - Who is the best bat or best bowler

rakeshmishra
Автор

Your ranking absolutely wrong and incorrect. Without Kapil Dev how could you set the list of great bowlers
Even Alan Donald never taken 661 test wickets. This information is totally wrong
Do not display the such type of bogus ranking. Prior to display read and learn more

alokanandaadhikary
Автор

There is no Ian Botham on the list. Do not see anybody whining😂😂😂😂😂😂

sauron
Автор

List is incomplete
No kapildev
Chaminda vas
Andy Roberts

narayanswamy
Автор

yes .Alan donald did not take 661 . It is typo error, may be 361, Also if we see the no.of wickets pet test, 5 or more per test Muralidharan stood first followed by Lillee and Hadlee . Lillee and Hadlee won many matches for their country and they bowled against one of gretest bastman of their era. Lillee bowled against Sobers, Kanhai, Gavaskar, Viv Richards, Llyod, Greenidge, Haynes, Boycott who are all solid batsman.

pradeepkumar-vmue
Автор

dont agree to this list. No george lohman, no sindey barnes? No O'Reilly, No Grimmet!!! You know, people used to play cricket before 1970 as well!

tahirqkhan
Автор

Where is Richard Hadlee, vAshwin, Holding, Botham, Kapil Dev,
Waqar is rated very low. Far better than Walsh Ambrose. Top 3 are ok. Otherwise indepth analysis is required

srinivasraosreekantapuram
Автор

Allan Donald did not take 661 wickets and how can you have a list without kaple dev disrespectful

nkosiwilson
Автор

Only one indian . I think kapil dev must be included. He takes his most wickets in Asian pitch that not help a fast bowler. Eligible other spinners are out in this list.

sankarkrishnan
Автор

I cannot see the subscriber logic at all, he have some form of mental problems. Because he is saying that not because Muli took 800 wickets, that he is better than Shane Warne who played more test than took 708, also Marshall with 356, and Ambrose with 408 test wickets. I don't know how to describe this person, because it seems he born. When is mother gone to market, because I have never heard so much stupidity in all my life. Because a bowlers took 800 wickets in his career, how you rated someone over him. Until someone breaks his record, it does not make any sense argued with some people. Because they will you get angry, and swear a lot, because they are pissing you off big time, ok.

BlairBoyd-fsxk
Автор

Kapil did an absard job, in India got 434 wickets, leave Dale, Hadley or others even wasim akram could it in Indian soil, I have doubt, kapil is within 20 no doubt, so its a fake.

anirbanbhattacharya
Автор

Wasim and waqar and shoaib akhtar best bowlers ever seriously on a different level

kindlyafroditi
Автор

Without KAPIL DEV this list not complit
Parhaps your knoledge is better than me But No need took 300 wicket taker You fit 5 boller who took 200 - 387 wicket.... Great
.... Donald wicket 661, ? Just He took only 330

umeshkamble
Автор

Just because Murali took 800 doesn't mean he's the greatest. He's no higher than top 5 in my opinion.
1. Shane Warne
2. Malcolm Marshall
3. Wasim Akram
4. Curtly Ambrose
5. Murali
6. Glenn McGrath

coffeesnob