Why the Tree of Life PROVES Dispensational Salvation for Tribulation and Millennial Saints!

preview_player
Показать описание
Bible Baptist Church
Pastor Andrew Sluder
828-231-3316

Get my book "Divorced But NOT Demoted"
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The Taco Bell ad that came before your monetized video had more truth than your actual video 😂

davidk
Автор

Which works/commandments do they have to do after the rapture?

verityandfaith
Автор

Which commandments do they need to do to get salvation after the rapture?

verityandfaith
Автор

dont know why they are giving a thumbs down?! keep up the good work brother!

jimmyyi
Автор

Gal.2:21 - I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

You are telling me that righteousness DID come by the law for 4, 000 years and will AGAIN come by the law in the future.

I would spend more time trying to explain why you are wrong, other than this explicit obvious verse, but I really feel like from hearing you here that you think you have it all figured out.

There is just so many things wrong with this teaching I don't even know where to begin and I don't know who convinced you of this stuff to begin with.

The tree of life argument you make here at the 6:00 minute mark. You are saying that during the tribulation people are saved by works in the tribulation, that people can lose their salvation in the tribulation, and that people can take from the tree of life after getting saved in the tribulation. You contrast this with Genesis 3 where God says they CAN'T take of the tree or else they would be living forever in a sinful state. Are you saying that people in the tribulation period are sinless or somehow are not in a fallen state upon earning their salvation by works?

Nobody can keep the commandments Andrew. Who taught you anything otherwise, the devil? This stuff is pure foolishness.

You talk about rightly dividing but to be honest you just aren't. Scriptures that speak to people keeping the commandments of God and obeying God and living for God are not always meant to be taken hyper literally as if they are perfect or something. You don't have to take some atheistic hyper literal hermeneutic like that. You also need to understand that in some of these Scriptures the people are resurrected and no longer in a fallen state so they literally then never do sin again.

I believe this is the kind of teaching and loose handling of the Scripture that leads people to Covenant Theology. You, what your doing right here, are the reason people like Steven Anderson hate dispensationalism. I don't blame them. They see what you teach here and they buck at it so hard they think there is no truth to the future for Israel in the Bible.

xskoalx
Автор

Did Adam have right to the tree of life before the fall....?

verityandfaith
Автор

The irony is your hypocrisy. You call Mid Acts Dispensationalists hyper. But the Mid Acts folks will say they are not hyper, using the same arguments you just made, and will tell you that only the Acts 28 position is hyper dispensationalism.

jeffayers
Автор

Why dont you explain to us NON-Dispensational people the difference between HYPER-Dispensation and Just the regular Dispensation. The teaching on the internet is not clear or trustworthy. You could make a short YouTube and explain. No charge for this Idea.

rontodd
Автор

When I was in Texas looking for a church, I went to a KJV church, but they talk looking forward to the cross with old testament salvation. Me being a one-year-old christian, I was still ignorant as to how to rebuke them on that . I knew it wasn't right but I couldn't prove it in one minute

MTE
Автор

Good day brother Sluder, it would appear you just knocked out one of the favorite parables that pre-tribulation rapture Christians use by, turning the seven churches into tribulation churches. I agree with you in regards to these churches but it is slim Pickens finding other verses that support a pre-tribulation rapture.Thank you for staying faithful to The Lord

desertfox