Solving a 'Harvard' University entrance exam | Find x?

preview_player
Показать описание
Harvard University Admission Interview Tricks | 99% Failed Admission Exam | Algebra Aptitude Test

Playlist 👇
• Math Olympiad

University Admission Exam Question || Algebra Problem || Entrance Aptitude Simplification Test || Tricky Interview
Harvard University
Oxford University
Cambridge University
Ivy League Schools
#math​ #maths​
#algebra​ #exponent​#olympiad​ #simplification​#exam​
Oxford University Interview Question
Cambridge University Interview Question
Harvard University Interview Question
Lambert W Function
#matholympiad​ #algebra​#math​#simplification​ #Exponents​#vedicmath​#viralmathproblem​ #howto​#mathematics​ #mathematicslesson​
#oxford​ #cambridge​ #harvard​
Hello, my beloved family! 😍😍😍
If you enjoyed this video on How to solve this Math Olympiad problem, please show your support by liking and subscribing to my channel. Your support means the world to me! 😊😊😊
France math Olympiad
Germany math Olympiad
Japanese math Olympiad
china math Olympiad

France math Olympiad

maths Olympiad questions
Japanese multiplication method
math Olympiad problems
math problem
algebra 2

Math Olympiad | A Nice Algebra Problem | How to solve this problem
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem
A Nice Exponents Problem
A Nice Math Olympiad Exponential Problem
Olympiad Algebra
Solving quartic equation
Solving A Quadratic Equations
International Math Olympiad Problem
International Math Olympiad Problem,
math olympiad topics
olympiad preparation
international olympiad maths
olympiad mathematics
international olympiads
international maths olympiad
olympiad
junior math olympiad
international mathematics olympiad
mathematics
math olympiad
international math olympiad 2024
international math olympiad
math olympiad problem
math olympiad preparation
american math olympiad question
math olympiad questions
math olympiad question
math olympiad problem
olympiad mathematics
math olympiad training
Canada maths olympiad
Malaysia math olympiad problems
math olympiad preparation
math olympiad questions
math olympiad algebra problem
maths olympiad
olympiad, mathematical olympiad
france math olympiad question
olympiad math problems
france maths olympiad preparation
olympiad math
maths trick
math olympiad algebra
france math olympiad questions
high school math
France | Can You Solve this ? Math Olympiad
can you solve this complex problem?
can you solve this logic puzzle?
can you solve this olympiad question?
olympiad
maths olympiad
olympiad mathematics
math olympiad
math olympiad question
math olympiad questions
mathematical olympiad
math olympiad training
math olympiad preparation
math olympiad problem
olympiad math
math olympiad algebra problem
math olympiad problems
olympiad math problems
maths
france maths olympiad
Luxembourg- Math Olympiad Questions
thailand junior maths olympiad problem
olympiad math problems
beautiful algebra problem
viral math problem
math olympiad problem
Nice Algebra Math Simplification Find Value of X
Russian Math Olympiad Question.
Japanese | Can you solve this ? | Math Olympiad
Math Olympiad | A Nice Algebra Problem | How to solve for X and Y in this Problem?
Japanese Math Olympiad Question | A Nice Algebra Problem
UK | Can you solve this ?| Math Olympiad
Japanese Math Olympiad | Calculators Not allowed !
France Math Olympiad | Calculator Not Allowed!
Germany| Can you solve this ? |A Nice Maths Olympiad problem
China | Can you solve this ? Math Olympiad
France | Can you solve this ? | Math Olympiad
Iran Math Olympiad - Algebra - Find f(0)?
France Math Olympiad | Calculator Not Allowed
Russian- Math Olympiad Question
International Maths Olympiad Problem
Russian Math Olympiad Question.
Japanese | Can you solve this ? | Math Olympiad
Math Olympiad | A Nice Algebra Problem | How to solve for X and Y in this Problem?
Japanese Math Olympiad Question | A Nice Algebra Problem
France | Can you solve this ?| Math Olympiad
Japanese Math Olympiad | Calculators Not allowed !
France Math Olympiad | Calculator Not Allowed!
Germany| Can you solve this ? |A Nice Maths Olympiad problem
China | Can you solve this ? Math Olympiad
Germany| Can you solve this ? |A Nice Math Olympiad
Math Olympiad | A Nice Algebra Problem | How to solve this problem
A Nice Math Olympiad Algebra Problem
viral math problem,
math Olympiad problem
Math Olympiad Question | Equation Solving| You should know this trick!!
Japanese -A Nice Math Olympiad Problem
Math Olympiad Problem | You should know this trick!!
Viral Math Olympiad Problem | How to solve
Algebra - Nice Math Olympiad Problem #maths​​
US Math Olympiad problem #maths​​
Nice Exponent Math Simplification | Find the value of X??
Math Olympiad Question | Nice Algebraic Equations
math Olympiad problems ! viral math problems
Brazil Maths Olympiad Question #maths​​ #matholympiad @MathOlympiad0

Math Olympiad Question | Algebra
A Nice Chinese Olympiad Exponential Problem
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Giving a proof of correctness for the (one) solution found is highly laudable.
Few presenters do it.

MatthiasBode-huqe
Автор

By missing one of the solutions, you've proven to belong to the 99%. Logarithms are your friend at solving exponential equations.

avhuf
Автор

The equation given is:
\[ 3^x = x^9 \]

Our goal is to find all real numbers \( x \) that satisfy this equation. At first glance, it's not immediately clear how to solve for \( x \) because the variable appears both in the exponent (as in \( 3^x \)) and in the base (as in \( x^9 \)). This makes the equation transcendental, meaning it cannot be solved using standard algebraic methods like factoring or applying logarithms directly.

Initial Observations

1. Positive Solutions: Since \( 3^x \) is always positive for real \( x \), \( x^9 \) must also be positive. This implies that \( x \) must be positive because:
- If \( x \) is negative, \( x^9 \) is negative (since 9 is an odd exponent), and \( 3^x \) remains positive.
- At \( x = 0 \), \( 3^0 = 1 \) and \( 0^9 = 0 \), which are not equal.

Therefore, we can restrict our search to \( x > 0 \).

2. Obvious Solution: Let's test simple integer values.
- \( x = 1 \): \( 3^1 = 3 \) vs \( 1^9 = 1 \). Not equal.
- \( x = 3 \): \( 3^3 = 27 \) vs \( 3^9 = 19683 \). Not equal.
- \( x = 9 \): \( 3^9 = 19683 \) vs \( 9^9 \) is a very large number. Clearly, \( 9^9 \) is much larger than \( 3^9 \).

None of these work. Maybe non-integer values?

Rewriting the Equation:

To make progress, let's take the natural logarithm of both sides to bring down the exponents:
\[ \ln(3^x) = \ln(x^9) \]
\[ x \ln(3) = 9 \ln(x) \]

Let's rearrange terms to group \( x \) and \( \ln(x) \):
\[ \frac{x}{\ln(x)} = \frac{9}{\ln(3)} \]

This form suggests that we might consider the function \( f(x) = \frac{x}{\ln(x)} \) and find when it equals \( \frac{9}{\ln(3)} \).

Analyzing the Function \( f(x) = \frac{x}{\ln(x)} \)

First, let's understand the behavior of \( f(x) \):

1. **Domain**: \( \ln(x) \) is defined for \( x > 0 \), but \( \ln(x) = 0 \) at \( x = 1 \), causing a division by zero. So, \( x \in (0, 1) \cup (1, \infty) \).

2. Behavior:
- As \( x \to 0^+ \), \( \ln(x) \to -\infty \), so \( f(x) \to 0 \).
- At \( x \to 1^- \), \( \ln(x) \to 0^- \), so \( f(x) \to -\infty \).
- At \( x \to 1^+ \), \( \ln(x) \to 0^+ \), so \( f(x) \to +\infty \).
- As \( x \to +\infty \), \( f(x) \to +\infty \) because \( x \) grows faster than \( \ln(x) \).

3. **Critical Points**: To find minima or maxima, take the derivative:
\[ f'(x) = \frac{\ln(x) - x \cdot \frac{1}{x}}{(\ln(x))^2} = \frac{\ln(x) - 1}{(\ln(x))^2} \]
Set \( f'(x) = 0 \):
\[ \ln(x) - 1 = 0 \implies \ln(x) = 1 \implies x = e \]

At \( x = e \), \( f(x) = \frac{e}{1} = e \). This is a minimum because:
- For \( 1 < x < e \), \( \ln(x) < 1 \), so \( f'(x) < 0 \) (function decreasing).
- For \( x > e \), \( \ln(x) > 1 \), so \( f'(x) > 0 \) (function increasing).

Finding Solutions:

We need to solve:
\[ \frac{x}{\ln(x)} = \frac{9}{\ln(3)} \approx \frac{9}{1.0986} \approx 8.196 \]

From the analysis:
- The minimum value of \( f(x) \) is \( e \approx 2.718 \), and \( f(x) \) increases to \( +\infty \) as \( x \) increases beyond \( e \).
- Therefore, the equation \( f(x) = k \) for \( k > e \) has two solutions: one in \( (1, e) \) and one in \( (e, \infty) \).

Let's find these two solutions.

First Solution: \( x \in (1, e) \)

Let's try \( x = 1.5 \):
\[ f(1.5) = \frac{1.5}{\ln(1.5)} \approx \frac{1.5}{0.4055} \approx 3.699 \]
Too low compared to 8.196.

Try \( x = 2 \):
\[ f(2) = \frac{2}{\ln(2)} \approx \frac{2}{0.6931} \approx 2.885 \]
Still low.

This suggests that our first solution might be very close to 1.

Let \( x = 1 + \epsilon \), where \( \epsilon \) is small:
\[ \ln(1 + \epsilon) \approx \epsilon - \frac{\epsilon^2}{2} \]
\[ f(1 + \epsilon) \approx \frac{1 + \epsilon}{\epsilon - \frac{\epsilon^2}{2}} \approx \frac{1}{\epsilon} \] (for small \( \epsilon \))
Set \( \frac{1}{\epsilon} \approx 8.196 \implies \epsilon \approx 0.122 \)

So, \( x \approx 1.122 \).

Let's test \( x = 1.1 \):
\[ f(1.1) \approx \frac{1.1}{0.0953} \approx 11.54 \]
Too high.

Try \( x = 1.2 \):
\[ f(1.2) \approx \frac{1.2}{0.1823} \approx 6.582 \]
Still below 8.196.

This suggests the solution is between 1.1 and 1.2.

Let's try \( x = 1.15 \):
\[ \ln(1.15) \approx 0.1398 \]
\[ f(1.15) \approx \frac{1.15}{0.1398} \approx 8.226 \]
Close to 8.196.

Adjust to \( x = 1.147 \):
\[ \ln(1.147) \approx 0.137 \]
\[ f(1.147) \approx \frac{1.147}{0.137} \approx 8.372 \]
Still high.

Try \( x = 1.14 \):
\[ \ln(1.14) \approx 0.131 \]
\[ f(1.14) \approx \frac{1.14}{0.131} \approx 8.702 \]
Higher.

This suggests that the first solution might be slightly above 1.147, but our approximation is not precise. For a more accurate solution, numerical methods like the Newton-Raphson method would be more appropriate. However, for our purposes, we can approximate it around \( x \approx 1.15 \).

But let's recall that \( \frac{9}{\ln(3)} \approx 8.196 \), and \( f(1.147) \approx 8.372 \), which is higher. Maybe \( x \approx 1.13 \):
\[ \ln(1.13) \approx 0.122 \]
\[ f(1.13) \approx \frac{1.13}{0.122} \approx 9.262 \]
Still higher.

This indicates that the first solution might not be straightforward to approximate manually. Let's move to the second solution where \( x > e \).

Second Solution: \( x \in (e, \infty) \)

We know \( f(x) \) increases for \( x > e \), and \( f(e) = e \approx 2.718 \), and \( f(x) \to \infty \) as \( x \to \infty \).

We need \( f(x) \approx 8.196 \). Let's try \( x = 3 \):
\[ f(3) = \frac{3}{\ln(3)} \approx \frac{3}{1.0986} \approx 2.731 \]
Too low.

Try \( x = 10 \):
\[ f(10) = \frac{10}{\ln(10)} \approx \frac{10}{2.3026} \approx 4.343 \]
Still low.

Try \( x = 20 \):
\[ f(20) = \frac{20}{\ln(20)} \approx \frac{20}{2.9957} \approx 6.676 \]
Closer.

Try \( x = 25 \):
\[ f(25) = \frac{25}{\ln(25)} \approx \frac{25}{3.2189} \approx 7.766 \]
Almost there.

Try \( x = 27 \):
\[ f(27) = \frac{27}{\ln(27)} \approx \frac{27}{3.2958} \approx 8.192 \]
Very close to 8.196.

So, \( x \approx 27 \) seems to be a solution.

Let's verify:
\[ 3^{27} = (3^3)^9 = 27^9 \]
Indeed, \( 27^9 = x^9 \) when \( x = 27 \).

Thus, \( x = 27 \) is an exact solution.

Checking for Other Solutions:

From the behavior of \( f(x) \), we expect one more solution in \( (1, e) \). Let's see if \( x = 1.129 \) works:
Compute \( 3^{1.129} \approx e^{1.129 \ln(3)} \approx e^{1.129 \times 1.0986} \approx e^{1.240} \approx 3.455 \)
Compute \( 1.129^9 \):
First, \( 1.129^2 \approx 1.275 \)
Then \( 1.275^4 \approx 1.275^2 \times 1.275^2 \approx 1.626 \times 1.626 \approx 2.644 \)
Then \( 2.644 \times 1.129 \approx 2.986 \)
Then \( 2.986^{something} \)... This seems tedious, and likely not exactly 3.455, but close enough to suggest a solution exists near this point.

However, finding the exact value manually is challenging. For practical purposes, \( x = 27 \) is a clear solution, and there's another near \( x \approx 1.129 \).

Conclusion:

After analyzing the equation \( 3^x = x^9 \), we find two real solutions:

1. Approximate Solution: \( x \approx 1.129 \) (found numerically, exact form not simple)
2. Exact Solution: \( x = 27 \)

Verification of \( x = 27 \)

Let's verify \( x = 27 \):
\[ 3^{27} = (3^3)^9 = 27^9 \]
This holds true since \( 3^3 = 27 \).

Verification of Approximate Solution \( x \approx 1.129 \)

Compute \( 3^{1.129} \approx 3.455 \)
Compute \( 1.129^9 \):
Using logarithms:
\[ \ln(1.129^9) = 9 \ln(1.129) \approx 9 \times 0.121 \approx 1.089 \]
\[ 1.129^9 \approx e^{1.089} \approx 2.971 \]

Hmm, not exactly 3.455, but close. A more precise approximation would be \( x \approx 1.129 \), but it seems our initial estimate might be slightly off. Refining:

Let's try \( x = 1.150 \):
\[ \ln(1.150) \approx 0.1398 \]
\[ f(1.150) \approx 8.226 \]
We need \( f(x) \approx 8.196 \), so slightly lower \( x \).

Try \( x = 1.147 \):
\[ f(1.147) \approx 8.372 \]
Still high.

This suggests the first solution is very close to \( x \approx 1.15 \), but not exact. For a more accurate value, advanced numerical methods would be necessary.

Final Answer:

The equation \( 3^x = x^9 \) has two real solutions:

1. \( x \approx 1.129 \) (approximate)
2. \( x = 27 \) (exact)

Primary Exact Solution: \( \boxed{27} \)


~ The final Asian boss, Deepseek

dummy
Автор

The graphs of these function show another intersection at x=1.1508...

felsenHome
Автор

At my school, providing one solution just because after some transformation it becomes obvious, while providing no proof of uniqueness, would not be accepted.

vadim
Автор

Sir! Construct the intersection point of the line and the plane in the third octant. High school geometry. 100% of your spectators will be glad to know how to do this. You have good pedagogical experience, and you can do it understandable for every pupil.

GrigoriyKatsman
Автор

Entrance exams: solving the questions that will never come up in your life

rightfootlefthand
Автор

Just use both side by ln(x) to simplify it.

RIDEacacademy
Автор

Huh? x^y=a^b doesn't give us x=a and y=b; you failed to mention that the root and base are the same
Also, isn't that convenient that you had powers of 3 on both sides that allowed you to rewrite it that way... What happens in the general case where that may not be?

RajJathar-Ind
Автор

3^x=x^9, log(3^x)=log(x^9), x*log(3)=9*log(x), define f(x)=x*log(3) & g(x)=9*log(x). Then find x such that f(x)=g(x). You know there are two intersections for f(x) and g(x) after a little play.
at x=1.151 f(1.151)=1.151*0.4771=0.5491. g(1.151)=9*log(1.151)=0.5497, you proved f(27)=g(27). You missed another intersection around x=1.151. How can we find it analytically?
@felsenHome already pointed out it on his comment.

bluesky
Автор

challenge to you: find all positive integers a, b such that a^x = x^b for some positive integer x.

jeancerrien
Автор

3^x=x^9 >>>> 3^1/9 = x^1/x >>>
3^ (3/3* 1/9) >>> 3^(3*1/3*9) >>> (3*3*3)^1/27 >>>(27)^1/27 = x^1/x
>>> 1/27 = 1/x >>>

ilyashick
Автор

Finding the other solutions to this equation requires the Lambert W function.

bobbyheffley
Автор

POV Indian, Chinese and Japanese: Oh I remember when I was class 2 i was the only student to not solve this question and failed in the exam

sanjaymandalsmr
Автор

There are 2 values or solutions for x..

ahmedkebsi
Автор

I solved it little different...imagine what can make both side equal but x = 3 then realized have take a multiple of 3 but bigger number than 9 and which is also multiple of 9, so put x= 27 and both side are equal, obviously putting 18 doen not make equal,

vipinmishra
Автор

Eine Aufnahmeprüfung "löst" man nicht, sondern eine AUFGABE der Aufnahmeprüfung.

Peter-imf
Автор

muy interesante forma de resolverlo!!!

edgardotrujillo
Автор

คำถามต่องการอะไร...ในเมื่อ x ตัวเดียว แต่ทำไม่คนละค่า

dhewanboonrawd
Автор

Good work, also follow, Junior Secondary School Mathematics (Justin)

justinmutembei
join shbcf.ru