Judge Targets NFA and DEFENDS Machine Guns In Ruling!

preview_player
Показать описание
Hannah Hill, Vice President of the National Foundation for Gun Rights, discusses a recent ruling out of the 5th Circuit, where a judge rules the NFA is unconstitutional and fails the Buren test.

00:00 The courts are waking up.
00:37 United States v. Brown
01:31 SCOTUS on the NFA
03:57 Why the NFA fail's Bruen
05:25 Judge Calls out NFA
07:03 Statute of North Hampton
09:29 Machine Guns Aren't "Unusual"
12:54 Where does this ruling go from here?
15:15 Join the FIGHT!
Комментарии
Автор

For anyone who didn't get the joke in the thumbnail. There's a meme where Danny Devito has a revelation and says "I finally get it." The joke of the thumbnail is that the judge finally understands that the NFA is constitutional.

NAGRstaff
Автор

The fact that machine guns were arbitrarily restricted never made sense—especially when the 'shall not be infringed' part of the Second Amendment is pretty clear.

AllAboutSurvival
Автор

The 2nd Amendment details the rights of the people to possess militia "weapons" and therefore, ANY firearm should be 100% lawful... we the people should be allowed to posses any and all "military style firearms"...

AusJackal
Автор

01:50 I love how you correctly call it a “standard capacity magazine ban” instead of a “high” capacity magazine ban. 👏👏

cbrrob
Автор

I have zero trust in government, and zero trust in the officers of the law.

FrogSlough-yn
Автор

It makes no sense whatsoever that it is an as applied ruling. A ruling like that flat out should be applied to all seeing as it is absolutely unconstitutional.

spudg
Автор

If the machine Gun band can't be enforced on Him, it cannot be enforced on us

RaymondWKing-dnwf
Автор

I'm still looking for the clause in the second amendment that allows government to infringe on the right to keep and bear "Dangerous and Unusual" arms.

phillipsmith
Автор

My dumbass thought that was Danny DeVito.

Jdcakamatsu
Автор

I need someone to clarify "Dangerous and Unusual" and cites Blackstone. When you read Blackstone it READS "Dangerous or Unusual".

travisi
Автор

Thanks for the hard work! I'm a very proud member!

goodcitizen
Автор

There needs to be changes to the oath these breakers take. They should be forced to read the bill of right aloud and swear the oath to uphold that version of it not their own personal rendition of it!! The words are pretty clear. Shall not be infringed…

danav
Автор

AR15's are not machine guns, nor are they assault weapons, this applies to the AK47 rifle and all it's variants. The 2nd Amendment protects machine guns for civilian ownership to protect against criminals and a tyrannical government.

raymondjallen
Автор

"That would be a startling reading..."
Well, get startled, skrub!

KaletheQuick
Автор

Much appreciation for this madam host and her narration, both the style and the substance, makes it easier and pleasant for a non law and average intelligence joe like myself, to understand.
Thank you.
🇺🇸🤠🙏🏼🤟🏼👏🏼👍🏼

bmaxse
Автор

So, Mr. Brown can have a "machine gun" in his home, but nowhere else.

pistolgripmag
Автор

A judge that actually read the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution? It's about time.

rossfelton
Автор

4:34 "text, history, and tradition" test is complete arbitrary BS, but if they really wanna go down that road.... The original text is plain enough for a 5 YO to read and understand(from the 1780's), There was/is NO American arms laws/ rules/ traditions/ or history older than the ratification of the Oh yeah, the supremacy clause, and the 10A.... just a couple of cherries on top. So if THAT'S the test they want to go with, all laws, rules, and regulations need to be repealed back to the ratification date.

joearledge
Автор

You would think that this would go to show Colorado assault weapons ban known as semiautomatic firearms ban as being unconstitutional

scottscheuerman
Автор

If it works for him, why not us? What about “liberty and justice for all “??

dannyboy
visit shbcf.ru