Evaluating a limit from a recursive sequence

preview_player
Показать описание
How do we find the limit of a sequence if we are given the recursive formula? Note: this method might not always work. We have to know if the sequence converges or not first. This question can be for precalculus or calculus 2.

---------------------------------------------------------
If you find this channel helpful and want to support it, then you can
join the channel membership and have your name in the video descriptions:
buy a math shirt or a hoodie (10% off with the code "WELCOME10"):

---------------------------------------------------------
Best wishes to you,
#justcalculus
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Any chance we will get some Calc 3 on this channel? Thanks for all the content man

Vladivostok
Автор

The red fractions in the denominator also converge to the square root of 2. 3/2, 7/5, 17/12, 41/29, ... (√2 + 1)^n = a + b√2----> this formula also produces the coefficients of the fractions in the denominator which are a/b. Also, notice the sequence of integers in the fractions. The sum of numerator and denominator in each fraction is the denominator of the next fraction, and the sum of the numerator and twice the denominator in each fraction becomes the numerator of the following fraction.
Example: 3/2--3 +2 = 5, so 5 is the denominator of the next fraction which is 7/5. 3 + 2x2 = 7, which is the numerator of the next fraction.
Finally, the sequence produces all numbers that are both simultaneously square and triangular. The first fraction is technically 1/1. Now 1^2 x 1^2 = 1, which is the first number that is both square and triangular. The second fraction is 3/2, so we get 3^2 x 2^2 = 9 x 4 = 36, which is indeed the second number that is simultaneously square and triangular. Third fraction, 7/5. 7^2 x 5^2 = 49x25=1, 225 which is the third one. Etc. Very cool sequence you picked.

ricardoguzman
Автор

Thanks for the help. I really had no idea how to solve this problem.

todr
Автор

The negative solution for L²=2 is for the limit when n tends to minus infinity.

It's easy to see that if you know the formula for the general term a_n:
a_n =

And the process to find the above formula could be a nice video as well. 😉

EngMorvan
Автор

How do you prove that it conv tho? I know how to do it for a series but for this one its wierd cus i cant say wether an+1< or > an for n>n0

nitayweksler
Автор

If we assume that the limit exists, we can simply solve for x = 1 + 1/(x+1) => x - 1 = 1/(x+1) => (x-1)(x+1) = 1 => x^2 - 1 = 1 => x^2 = 2
Now then the question is whether there is any starting a_1 for which the limit approaches the negative branch of sqrt2

jorgelenny
Автор

you're such a genius always helping me with my doubts

axeldaliramirezgonzalez
Автор

Coincidentally, we had the limit of a recursive sequence on my further maths test today. But it was way duckin harder

NewtonMD
Автор

Math is beautiful. You proved it one more time. This proof is genius. Love it.

imtiazursyed
Автор

I was lost trying to figure this one out. Perfect explanation. Well done.

jaywyn
Автор

Just by the nature of this recursive definition, you can see that "infinity" is not even possible, because the left hand side would approach infinity while the right hand side will approach 1, which is a clear contradiction.

sujitsivadanam
Автор

Something my teacher in school said is that when we try to calculate recursive sequences, we take the U(n+1) as a function f(Un+1)= f(x) and then solve for f(x)=x.
I tried it on this question and it gave 2 answers, sqr(2) and -sqr(2)

kepler
Автор

Can u use more video's equation like this?

saharhaimyaccov
Автор

Another technique (my favorite) is to express the sequence in terms of n. Then solving like a normal function.

ChrisKoyo
Автор

This is similar to how I worked out the asymptotic limit of the ratios of consecutive numbers in the Fibonacci sequence, although I didn't know to prove that there WAS a limit.

JayTemple
Автор

When I noticed the values a(n) oscillated around the resulting limits, I tried to express the members of the sequence using an alternating series:
a(n)= 1 + ( 1/2 - 1/10 + 1/60 - 1/348 + 1/2030 - . . .1/M(n-1)) = 1 + SUM_(k=1)^(n-1) (-1)^(k+1)/M(k) ...for n>1; a(1)=1
where M(k) can be expressed from denominators in the fractions: 1/1, 3/2, 7/5, 17/12, 41/29 ==> 1*2, 2*5, 5*12, 12*29....
M(k) = 1/8*((1+√2)^(2k+1) + (1-√2)^(2k+1) - 2*(-1)^k)
How to prove that members in the series have to be integers reciprocal ?

panPetrff
Автор

wow another nice way to calculate sqrt2

pneujai
Автор

But how can we proof that the sequence converges?

맹맛초코
Автор

The common term should have either sqrt(2)+1 or sqrt(2)-1 for this sequence.

tayserbinjafor
Автор

Could show the convergence of odd and even subsequences first, then show two subsequences converge to the same limit, and hence the whole sequence converges.

gogo-pjlm
join shbcf.ru