Russia's DEADLIEST Fighter jet | Su-57 Airshow Performance

Breaking down the Su-57 (T-50) flying demonstration from another camera angle at the Zhuhai airshow. Sergey Bogdan, chief test pilot of Russia's Sukhoi, performed at the Zhuhai Airshow. This is a second look at Russia's 5th Generation stealth fighter flying demonstration at the airshow.

The prototype of the Su-57, the T-50, was performed last week at the Zhuhai Airshow in China. Sergey Bogdan performed in the T-50, showcasing Russia's latest 5th-generation stealth fighter.

🔸Join this channel to get access to perks:

---
🎙️ Sponsor Links🎙️
14-day free trial

----
✈️ Afterburn Podcast Links ✈️

Chapters

00:00 Introduction to the Su-57 and Its Maneuverability
02:53 Analyzing the Su-57's Takeoff and Low-Speed Maneuvers
06:05 High Angle of Attack and Dogfighting Capabilities
09:11 Final Thoughts on the Su-57's Performance

[lwty]

I was there in this year’s Zhuhai Airshow. Su-57 was extremely impressive. The maneuverability of Su-35 was already great enough. But Su-57 is just another level.

[СтаниславЗайцев-сн]

I work for a company that develops equipment for the Su-57. The T-50 has almost all the avionics from the Su-35S, except for the AFAR radar. The serial Su-57 has completely new avionics and a new multicore computer and NeuroMatrix neural computing system. The production car is covered with a stealth coating, the 101 Atoll circular defense system is installed, and since December of this year all Su-57s from the factory are coming with a new engine that provides the Su-57 with supersonic cruising speed without afterburner up to Mach 2.

[Thesavior]

Dear pilot, Su 34 pilots were able to Maneuver and escape very fast patriot missiles. You can find the audio on youtube.

[alexkor]

At air shows and demonstration flights, the best test pilots land the plane. this applies to everyone, Americans and Russians and other countries. at the same time, there is one immutable fact. The Americans, with their super planes, always rejected the Russians’ invitations to a demonstration air battle.

[batas]

when I opened the video thinking that I got to the review of a professional pilot, but I got to an envious whiner 😂

[tarkus]

I've never seen such a short takeoff run... I think this plane would be able to take off from an aircraft carrier without the need for a catapult. Simply amazing.

[obj]

Saw this plane, takes off in less UNREAL!

No mention in video.

[krendel]

Russians, don't feed American bots with your comments. Just enjoy the video taken at the air show.

[sermoz]

All Americans who review the Su57 when discussing maneuvers make the same mistake, do they all consider the Su57 as a fighter analogue of the F22? but this is not so, the Su57 is a multi-role aircraft, it is designed not only for air supremacy but also for striking ground targets, surface targets, and most importantly, it works as an AWACS and can coordinate both air and ground operations. This is why many maneuvers for quickly assessing the radar situation.

[spartacusreview]

The Airframe been able to withstand these Manoeuvres is very impressive

[kylekyle]

The author of the video mentioned how skeptical he was of dogging missiles with maneuvers and how you can’t see them and “good luck trying to dodge them”. There is audio of an SU-34 dodging multiple Patriot missiles and he even mentions seeing the missiles, his wingman or AWACS was even tracking the missile warning the SU-34 pilot. He successfully defeated the missiles and one actually exploded very close to the aircraft. There is also F-16 HUD footage where the F-16 was dodging missiles as well.

In regards to maneuverability, people forget the SU-57 has 360 degree radar coverage and high off bore missiles. The fact is that this aircraft does not need to do crazy maneuvering in order to launch a missile as one of the radar(s) will provide a weapons lock even if the aircraft is not pointing towards the threat. The S-70 Okhonik drone is also meant to compliment the SU-57 and it’s should have a much smaller RCS, in theory the SU-57 would never need to engage as the S-70 would do that first. Therefore, the S-70 and AWACS can feed the SU-57 information through datalink or even help jam enemy aircraft. As much as westerners like to sh!t on the SU-57, it has capabilities not yet found on any other aircraft such as its full radar coverage, a versatile heavy long range stealth drone that it uses as a wingman, it also comes with long range stealth cruise and stealth loitering munitions, it has excellent range, payload, maneuverability and by all accounts a very good spectrum of avionics, everything from IRST to MAWS and everything in between.

One SU-57 was operating deep in Ukrainian airspace when it shot down an S-70 that lost communications? What is interesting is that both aircraft were operating at high altitude and in the middle of the day while facing threats from Patriots, S-300s, NASAMs, F-16s, SU-27s, MiG-29s and many ground based radars and potentially NATO drones and AWACS. This shows that both aircraft have a small enough RCS to evade the best NATO and Soviet air defenses and radars.

[jcarvalho]

I've seen western fighter jets doing really cool unpractical stunts and nobody roast them like some western youtuber pilots, experts or whatever, keep doing when it is a russian jet. I understand that. After all they have to convince themselves somehow that they are capable and superior, protect their confidence and find some comfort within their ego. Or maybe they don't have nothing else to do, I don't know.

Nevertheless this manoeuvrability goes as a show off and it is AWSOME! Just accept the fact and that's it. Russians have a really good reason to take aerodynamics and manoeuvrability in consideration as it is quite practical somehow. Maybe not for the Americans but in Europe it is a must, so just take the SU 34 bomber dodging 3 patriot missiles, as an example. Russians can be proud about those 3d thrust nozzles or not?!

Besides, we all know no western airforce messes around, not even with SU27s during interseptions. Our pilots are not allowed and they would be in a lot of trouble provoking a dog fight with those things. These are the real world situationns russians have to take in consideration and they are succeeding. The SU57 has been flying in Ukraine without being detected and they have no rush to mass produce it because they don't need to. They can have more time to improve the thing the way they feel it is necessary, and although I'm quite sure they don't underestimate wstern tech like you do with them, they don't care much about planes like for example the f22 as it is not a threat to them at all. F15s, F18s, F16s, Rafales, Typhoons, Gripens and now F35s, are their biggest concern and they have more than capable machines to take care of these, and guarantee their air superiority. If not, they eventually find new practical solutions.

And by the way, it's not because someone thinks different that he/she is russian, or a bot. Got it?

[cuthbertadam]

Truthful comments from other people are nowadays BOTS, grow a chest and take the comments like a man.

[mirekslechta]

Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be, USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.

[maksimluzin]

All jets are producing smoke at very low speed, because of low oxygen intake. It's just physics, and nothing more. Less oxygen -> more smoke... I'm wonder why an ex-pilot don't know about that...

[name.]

I piloti russi sono i migliori al mondo e gli aerei e i caccia sono i migliori al mondo. I russi eseguono tali acrobazie nel cielo e nessuno può farlo. E' vero.

[Juandinggong]

Why this guy is deleting comments? Got to have thick skin if you wanna make videos and express your opinion be ready to hear what people have to say!!

[xro-dk]

Bro, I'm not a bot 😀I just wanted to see this "new" jet flying with a professional commentary and I watched your video. Sorry

[wisemansstory]

The amount of discussion about su 57 fighters automatically prove that su 57 is best

[pjbunnyru]

This is a bench test glider. Su57 combat aircraft have differences and other avionics. For bolts, fuselage coating, etc. - but radars copied wrong parameters of aircraft, this must be taken into account. Nobody knows what is hidden inside, what avionics, what weapons with what parameters a full-fledged aircraft can carry, radar is not on combat aircraft. That is, even you, experts (haha) do not know anything. But everyone in row comes up with something and tries to pretend that aircraft is bad. read comments of people who look at everything not through the prism - only american can be good.